Re: Git configuration

2010-02-19 Thread Simon Geard
On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 13:48 +, Andrew Benton wrote: > How do I tell git to remember all the changes to ${CURRENT_FILES} but to not > keep a copy of ${REMOVED_FILES} You don't - it's a version control system. If you don't want the tarballs versioned, don't store them in git. Instead, your be

Soprano Virtuoso Backend not located KDE4

2010-02-19 Thread cliffhanger
Hi Can someone help here? Despite being built by kdesupport the Soprano Virtuoso Backend is not being located by kdebase-runtime: - --- -- The following OPTIONAL packages could NOT be located on your system. -- Consider in

Re: Git configuration

2010-02-19 Thread Dominic Ringuet
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 8:48 AM, Andrew Benton wrote: > ... > Hello world exit status: Sorry if my solution sounds awful, it doesn't include the use of git, only bash scripts. First, I use a makefile which creates my bash scripts from xml then this bash script is copied to ".orig". Otherwordly

Re: Git configuration

2010-02-19 Thread Ken Moffat
On 19 February 2010 13:48, Andrew Benton wrote: > How do I tell git to remember all the changes to ${CURRENT_FILES} but to not > keep a copy of ${REMOVED_FILES} > > Andy > -- That I don't know, but keeping the downloaded tarballs under version control seems a little excessive. Perhaps you could

Re: blfs-support Digest, Vol 1970, Issue 1

2010-02-19 Thread Dale Stein
Matthew Burgess wrote: > Glibc which provides its own copy of getline() now. The easiest way > around this is something like: > > sed -i -e 's/getline/get_line/g' texk/web2c/lib/tangleboot.{c,h} I suggest you to use the following patch to fix all errors at once: http://svn.cross-lfs.org/svn/rep

Git configuration

2010-02-19 Thread Andrew Benton
Hello world, I use bash scripts to automate recompiling the systems I look after. I use git to keep track of the changes I make to the source tarballs and build scripts. It makes it very easy to distribute recent changes to the other computers - just git pull and all the recent changes are updat

Re: blfs-support Digest, Vol 1970, Issue 1

2010-02-19 Thread Andrew Benton
On 19/02/10 07:49, Dale Stein wrote: > ok thanks, I will be waiting for the update. No hurry mind you! > I just love what you guys are doing and have always read the posts with > interest. > > There are a few - more errors cropping up which I might expand on. > > 1) expect-5.43.0 suffers a fatal

Re: blfs-support Digest, Vol 1970, Issue 1

2010-02-19 Thread stosss
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 2:49 AM, Dale Stein wrote: > ok thanks,  I will be waiting for the update.  No hurry mind you! > I just love what you guys are doing and have always read the posts with > interest. Stop top posting. Trim and bottom post. Don't send all that garbage from the digest. -- htt