Re: checksums of packages

2010-08-22 Thread Bruce Dubbs
bendeguz wrote: > 2. This means it could be possible for some package to have > false checksums on the whole internet? > So you can't be absolutely sure, that you have downloaded a package > in the form the maintainer built it? It's possible, but quite unlikely. It would be discovered and all o

Re: checksums of packages

2010-08-22 Thread bendeguz
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 06:50:42PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 05:23:17PM +0200, bendeguz wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 02:37:27PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > > > > > > Actually, the situation is worse than that! For most packages > > > in the BLFS book, the md5sum was

Re: query on tex;live-2009

2010-08-22 Thread Nicolas FRANCOIS
Le Fri, 6 Aug 2010 18:38:11 +0100, luxInteg a écrit : > - my last posting had:- > --FORTesing > This was a 'probing attempt -no tests were performed. However > I needed TEX in the first place because of octave-3.3.52 which fails > to make without TEX using default settings.

Re: checksums of packages

2010-08-22 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 05:23:17PM +0200, bendeguz wrote: > On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 02:37:27PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > > > > Actually, the situation is worse than that! For most packages > > in the BLFS book, the md5sum was generated by an editor. > > I'm sure the gentoo sha sums are similar.

Re: checksums of packages

2010-08-22 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Ken Moffat wrote: > Actually, the situation is worse than that! For most packages > in the BLFS book, the md5sum was generated by an editor. > I'm sure the gentoo sha sums are similar. It's slightly better than that. The editor puts the checksum in the book, but I check them when the package

Re: checksums of packages

2010-08-22 Thread bendeguz
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 02:37:27PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > On 22 August 2010 13:12, bendeguz wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I have installed lfs and x about a week ago, so I've been > > using it as my desktop since then. Of course I'm still > > building it piece by piece. > > > > There are packages whi

Re: checksums of packages

2010-08-22 Thread Ken Moffat
On 22 August 2010 13:12, bendeguz wrote: > Hi! > > I have installed lfs and x about a week ago, so I've been > using it as my desktop since then. Of course I'm still > building it piece by piece. > > There are packages which are not in the blfs-book, > which doesn't have checksum information on th

checksums of packages

2010-08-22 Thread bendeguz
Hi! I have installed lfs and x about a week ago, so I've been using it as my desktop since then. Of course I'm still building it piece by piece. There are packages which are not in the blfs-book, which doesn't have checksum information on the server where the package is downloadable, or on the