Re: old radeon 7500 card, slow wm

2010-10-18 Thread bendeguz
> > > Actually, KMS also gives EXA some extra acceleration options when used with > hw acceleration. You might want to try to get it and see if it helps. Are > you aware of any reason it might not be enabled? If not, attach a dmesg log, > a xorg.log and a "GL_DEBUG=verbose glxinfo" and I could ta

Re: cant find usb printer (cups-1.4.4)

2010-10-18 Thread bendeguz
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 06:29:31PM -0400, linux fan wrote: > On 10/6/10, bendeguz wrote: > > > Do you have any suggestion? > > A careful read of > http://www.cups.org/str.php?L3357+P0+S-2+C0+I0+E0+M20+Qusblp > > HPLIP (and soon perhaps more manufacturer-supplied backends) > > is libusb-based, it

Re: cat /proc/version reports wrong info.

2010-10-18 Thread Ken Moffat
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 05:36:40PM -0400, cliffhan...@gardener.com wrote: > > > Have just reinstalled kernel to be sure, still reporting it wrongly. > > >LFS does not install a /lib/modules/RELEASE file. I've not heard of > >that before. > In connection with the misapprehension about the 'REL

Re: cat /proc/version reports wrong info.

2010-10-18 Thread linux fan
On 10/18/10, linux fan wrote: > You wil see a line such as: > lfs kernel: Inspecting /boot/System.map-2.6.33 > > ... and that 2.6.33 is the kernel version that booted. > Assuming that you named System.map-($uname -r) > Make that System.map-$(uname -r) -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/list

Re: cat /proc/version reports wrong info.

2010-10-18 Thread linux fan
On 10/18/10, cliffhan...@gardener.com wrote: > Have just reinstalled kernel to be sure, still reporting it wrongly. > grep -A 5 restart /var/log/sys.log | tail -6 ... assuming you are using sysklogd as is standard in lfs. You wil see a line such as: lfs kernel: Inspecting /boot/System.map-2.6.

Re: cat /proc/version reports wrong info.

2010-10-18 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Nathan Coulson wrote: > On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 2:36 PM, wrote: >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Bruce Dubbs >>> To: BLFS Support List >>> Sent: Mon, Oct 18, 2010 5:16 pm >>> Subject: Re: cat /proc/version reports wrong info. >>> cliffhan...@gardener.com wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> I've recen

Re: cat /proc/version reports wrong info.

2010-10-18 Thread Nathan Coulson
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 2:36 PM, wrote: > >>-Original Message- >>From: Bruce Dubbs >>To: BLFS Support List >>Sent: Mon, Oct 18, 2010 5:16 pm >>Subject: Re: cat /proc/version reports wrong info. > >>cliffhan...@gardener.com wrote: >> Hi >> >> I've recently installed LFS6.7 using jhalfs.

Re: cat /proc/version reports wrong info.

2010-10-18 Thread cliffhanger
>-Original Message- >From: Bruce Dubbs >To: BLFS Support List >Sent: Mon, Oct 18, 2010 5:16 pm >Subject: Re: cat /proc/version reports wrong info. >cliffhan...@gardener.com wrote: > Hi > > I've recently installed LFS6.7 using jhalfs. No probs. Building BLFS > now to own requirements,b

Re: cat /proc/version reports wrong info.

2010-10-18 Thread Bruce Dubbs
cliffhan...@gardener.com wrote: > Hi > > I've recently installed LFS6.7 using jhalfs. No probs. Building BLFS > now to own requirements,but I've discovered a problem with > /proc/version reporting wrong gcc version and compiled kernel. > > LFS 6.7 uses kernel 2.6.35.4 > > 'cat /proc/version'

Re: cat /proc/version reports wrong info.

2010-10-18 Thread Andrew Benton
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:15:17 -0400 cliffhan...@gardener.com wrote: > Hi > > I've recently installed LFS6.7 using jhalfs. No probs. Building BLFS > now to own requirements,but I've discovered a problem with > /proc/version reporting wrong gcc version and compiled kernel. > > LFS 6.7 uses kern

cat /proc/version reports wrong info.

2010-10-18 Thread cliffhanger
Hi I've recently installed LFS6.7 using jhalfs. No probs. Building BLFS now to own requirements,but I've discovered a problem with /proc/version reporting wrong gcc version and compiled kernel. LFS 6.7 uses kernel 2.6.35.4 'cat /proc/version' gives: Linux version 2.6.27.10 (r...@cliffhanger