>
>
> Actually, KMS also gives EXA some extra acceleration options when used with
> hw acceleration. You might want to try to get it and see if it helps. Are
> you aware of any reason it might not be enabled? If not, attach a dmesg log,
> a xorg.log and a "GL_DEBUG=verbose glxinfo" and I could ta
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 06:29:31PM -0400, linux fan wrote:
> On 10/6/10, bendeguz wrote:
>
> > Do you have any suggestion?
>
> A careful read of
> http://www.cups.org/str.php?L3357+P0+S-2+C0+I0+E0+M20+Qusblp
> > HPLIP (and soon perhaps more manufacturer-supplied backends)
> > is libusb-based, it
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 05:36:40PM -0400, cliffhan...@gardener.com wrote:
>
>
> Have just reinstalled kernel to be sure, still reporting it wrongly.
>
> >LFS does not install a /lib/modules/RELEASE file. I've not heard of
> >that before.
>
In connection with the misapprehension about the 'REL
On 10/18/10, linux fan wrote:
> You wil see a line such as:
> lfs kernel: Inspecting /boot/System.map-2.6.33
>
> ... and that 2.6.33 is the kernel version that booted.
> Assuming that you named System.map-($uname -r)
>
Make that System.map-$(uname -r)
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/list
On 10/18/10, cliffhan...@gardener.com wrote:
> Have just reinstalled kernel to be sure, still reporting it wrongly.
>
grep -A 5 restart /var/log/sys.log | tail -6
... assuming you are using sysklogd as is standard in lfs.
You wil see a line such as:
lfs kernel: Inspecting /boot/System.map-2.6.
Nathan Coulson wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 2:36 PM, wrote:
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Bruce Dubbs
>>> To: BLFS Support List
>>> Sent: Mon, Oct 18, 2010 5:16 pm
>>> Subject: Re: cat /proc/version reports wrong info.
>>> cliffhan...@gardener.com wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I've recen
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 2:36 PM, wrote:
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: Bruce Dubbs
>>To: BLFS Support List
>>Sent: Mon, Oct 18, 2010 5:16 pm
>>Subject: Re: cat /proc/version reports wrong info.
>
>>cliffhan...@gardener.com wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> I've recently installed LFS6.7 using jhalfs.
>-Original Message-
>From: Bruce Dubbs
>To: BLFS Support List
>Sent: Mon, Oct 18, 2010 5:16 pm
>Subject: Re: cat /proc/version reports wrong info.
>cliffhan...@gardener.com wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've recently installed LFS6.7 using jhalfs. No probs. Building
BLFS
> now to own requirements,b
cliffhan...@gardener.com wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've recently installed LFS6.7 using jhalfs. No probs. Building BLFS
> now to own requirements,but I've discovered a problem with
> /proc/version reporting wrong gcc version and compiled kernel.
>
> LFS 6.7 uses kernel 2.6.35.4
>
> 'cat /proc/version'
On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:15:17 -0400
cliffhan...@gardener.com wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've recently installed LFS6.7 using jhalfs. No probs. Building BLFS
> now to own requirements,but I've discovered a problem with
> /proc/version reporting wrong gcc version and compiled kernel.
>
> LFS 6.7 uses kern
Hi
I've recently installed LFS6.7 using jhalfs. No probs. Building BLFS
now to own requirements,but I've discovered a problem with
/proc/version reporting wrong gcc version and compiled kernel.
LFS 6.7 uses kernel 2.6.35.4
'cat /proc/version' gives:
Linux version 2.6.27.10 (r...@cliffhanger
11 matches
Mail list logo