On Wed, 2011-12-07 at 07:22 -0800, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> I believe this is not OT.
>
> Something odd happened today.
>
> Some of my machines kave firefox-8.0.1 binaries from mozilla installed
> (these distros, I have just for comparison and learning purposes).
>
> Fedora is one of them.
On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 17:51 +, Andrew Benton wrote:
> Roxterm is basically gnome terminal without the need to install Gnome.
> What's not to like?
According to my notes, Gnome Terminal (as of 3.0.1) depends on GTK+3 and
VTE (same as Roxterm), plus GConf and gsettings-desktop-schemas. That's
so
I've now built my desktop using gnome3 versions of (released) gnome
2 packages where applicable. As before, I'm not interested in the
gnome desktop itself, only enough to support the few applications I
use. A few things are a little bit nicer (e.g. epiphany now uses a
readable size of text), man
I believe this is not OT.
Something odd happened today.
Some of my machines kave firefox-8.0.1 binaries from mozilla installed (these
distros, I have just for comparison and learning purposes).
Fedora is one of them. Just to check for the version, I clicked in "About
Firefox", and to my surpri
On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 07:33 +, luxInteg wrote:
> Thanks for the reply. I now have it working of sorts Xwindows refusing to
> start was due to a typo (twn instead of twm) in .xinitrc. I still have
> keyboard errors ( for a gb/qwerty layout)
> and monitor resolution clipped at 1024x768. S