Re: [blfs-support] Shell at startup

2012-05-17 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Ken Moffat wrote: > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 05:00:01PM -0600, Andrew Elian wrote: >>> On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 08:38:59PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: >>> I'm all in favour of using /bin/bash, but supposedly the >>> bootscripts are shell-agnostic. So, which shells in the book >>> don't support brace e

Re: [blfs-support] Shell at startup

2012-05-17 Thread Ken Moffat
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 05:00:01PM -0600, Andrew Elian wrote: > > >On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 08:38:59PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > > I'm all in favour of using /bin/bash, but supposedly the > > bootscripts are shell-agnostic. So, which shells in the book > > don't support brace expansion ? > > Da

Re: [blfs-support] Shell at startup

2012-05-17 Thread Andrew Elian
Hello, > On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 08:47:53AM +0300, David D wrote: > > Since I am not an expert in shells, I figured "why not". > > Although there is a note that says that you have to reset the link > > to bash in order to build _LFS_, it doesn't say you need to reset the > > link in order to _boot

Re: [blfs-support] mutter and clutter

2012-05-17 Thread Armin K.
On 05/18/2012 12:16 AM, Lars Bamberger wrote: > > I set 'CFLAGS=-pipe' per my environment, except for some packages that > are sensitive to manipulation of CFLAGS (as mentioned in the book). I've > installed X with a prefix other than '/usr' and followed the book in > that issue, also creating the

Re: [blfs-support] mutter and clutter

2012-05-17 Thread Lars Bamberger
On 16.05.2012 23:10, Armin K. wrote: > [clutter-1.10.4 configure log] > I've compared your second log and my build log: > > checking GL/glx.h usability... yes > checking GL/glx.h presence... yes > checking for GL/glx.h... yes > -checking for glXCreateContext in -lGL... no > +checking for glX

Re: [blfs-support] Shell at startup

2012-05-17 Thread Ken Moffat
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 08:47:53AM +0300, David D wrote: > Since I am not an expert in shells, I figured "why not". > Although there is a note that says that you have to reset the link > to bash in order to build _LFS_, it doesn't say you need to reset the > link in order to _boot_ the OS. > "Why?"