Armin K wrote:
> On 23.5.2012 22:47, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Armin K wrote:
>>
>>> 1 SBU is arround 8 minutes (I think).
>> Ouch. Are you building on a 386? :)
> Pentium 4 HT with 1GB of DDR RAM. I can't remember, it is nearly a year
> since I measured SBU, and I upgraded my memory not so long ag
On 23.5.2012 22:47, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Armin K wrote:
>
>> 1 SBU is arround 8 minutes (I think).
>
> Ouch. Are you building on a 386? :)
>
> -- Bruce
>
>
Pentium 4 HT with 1GB of DDR RAM. I can't remember, it is nearly a year
since I measured SBU, and I upgraded my memory not so long ago.
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 03:36:38AM +0800, xinglp wrote:
> May be this reason, I lost "ldconfig" in Xorg Libraries.
> I'll try it tomorrow, and feed back
I think you mean that you did not run ldconfig after each library
was installed ? If so, any error would happen when ld failed to
find the libr
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 03:49:41PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> Original Message
> Subject: Error in BLS Python-2.7.3
> Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 17:00:53 -0300
> From: Marcos Yoshito Kasahara
> To: bdu...@linuxfromscratch.org
>
> Dear Bruce
>
> I think I have found a mistake in
Original Message
Subject: Error in BLS Python-2.7.3
Date: Wed, 23 May 2012 17:00:53 -0300
From: Marcos Yoshito Kasahara
To: bdu...@linuxfromscratch.org
Dear Bruce
I think I have found a mistake in Python-2.7.3 (
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/general/python2.htm
Armin K wrote:
> 1 SBU is arround 8 minutes (I think).
Ouch. Are you building on a 386? :)
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 07:38:54PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> In my case I build all the drivers on my current hardware (I've got
> big disks now, I can afford the space and I'd like to know if any
> of them fail to build because of an update elsewhere) so my own
> figures will almost certainly
May be this reason, I lost "ldconfig" in Xorg Libraries.
I'll try it tomorrow, and feed back
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
2012/5/24 Bruce Dubbs :
> xinglp wrote:
>> It said 3.0 SBU in the below URL, is that normal?
>> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/x/mesalib.html
>
> That's a little quick compared to my system. For MesaLib-7.11.2 I have
> 3.349 SBU and for MesaLib-8.0.2 I have 3.886 SBU.
>
> The SBU va
2012/5/24 Armin K :
> On 23.5.2012 19:14, xinglp wrote:
>> It said 3.0 SBU in the below URL, is that normal?
>> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/x/mesalib.html
>
> How much is that in minutes and how much is 1 SBU on your machine?
>
> It takes arround 30 minutes here, where 1 SBU is ar
On 23.5.2012 19:14, xinglp wrote:
> It said 3.0 SBU in the below URL, is that normal?
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/x/mesalib.html
How much is that in minutes and how much is 1 SBU on your machine?
It takes arround 30 minutes here, where 1 SBU is arround 8 minutes (I
think).
--
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 01:14:23AM +0800, xinglp wrote:
> It said 3.0 SBU in the below URL, is that normal?
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/x/mesalib.html
SBUs are only a rough guide. They get less accurate when older
toolchains are involved (e.g. if your host had an older gcc mi
xinglp wrote:
> It said 3.0 SBU in the below URL, is that normal?
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/x/mesalib.html
That's a little quick compared to my system. For MesaLib-7.11.2 I have
3.349 SBU and for MesaLib-8.0.2 I have 3.886 SBU.
The SBU values are only meant as an approxima
>On Tue, 22 May 2012 19:28:49 -0400
>alex lupu wrote:
>
> > Jeremy Henty schrieb am 22.05.2012 um 14:47 Uhr
>
> > This belongs on blfs-chat, if anywhere.
>
> but I don't wanna chat :'(
>
> Regards,
> -- Alex
Then post it to lfs-chat (there is no such thing as blfs-chat, but
there is lfs-c
14 matches
Mail list logo
