On Sun, 2013-02-03 at 23:13 +, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 02:57:21PM -0800, Michael C. Robinson wrote:
> > Is it possible to install gnome-shell without installing network manager?
> >
> > It is not needed on an NFS root system.
> >
> No idea, but google thinks it is/was pos
I'm stuck in fallback mode right now wondering if there is a simple
way to add firefox to the applications menu?
I have a Radeon HD5450, but the proprietary ATI driver doesn't want to
install for some reason. Granted, I didn't
have a working gnome installation when I tried it.
--
http://li
I was missing polkit-gnome and notification-daemon. Seems to be
working in fallback mode now.
Sound isn't working, but one thing at a time.
Quoting "Armin K." :
> On 02/04/2013 03:54 AM, Michael Robinson wrote:
>>
>> I broke the system by installing the network manager boot script.
>> I can g
On 02/04/2013 03:54 AM, Michael Robinson wrote:
>
> I broke the system by installing the network manager boot script.
> I can go in manually and remove it server side, but the same
> errors will remain. Looks like there is an issue with the Logitech
> receiver. Theoretically, I can plug in a wire
[root@goose64 michael]# cat gdm_errors.txt
(II) config/udev: Adding input device Logitech USB Receiver
(/dev/input/mouse0)
(II) No input driver specified, ignoring this device.
(II) This device may have been added with another device file.
(II) config/udev: Adding input device HDA ATI SB Line
(/de
On 02/04/2013 02:53 AM, Michael Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 02:47 +0100, Armin K. wrote:
>> On 02/04/2013 02:45 AM, Michael Robinson wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2013-02-03 at 17:38 -0800, Michael Robinson wrote:
On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 02:33 +0100, Armin K. wrote:
> On 02/04/2013 02:14 AM
On Mon, 4 Feb 2013 01:30:21 +
Ken Moffat wrote:
> I'm now in the process of downgrading my oldest x86_64 to x86_32 [
> i.e. i686 ] - recent g++ is unusable on a desktop x86_64 with only
> 2 GB of memeory and a uniprocessor (i.e. the desktop becomes
> unresponsive when compiling).
I'm sure
On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 02:47 +0100, Armin K. wrote:
> On 02/04/2013 02:45 AM, Michael Robinson wrote:
> > On Sun, 2013-02-03 at 17:38 -0800, Michael Robinson wrote:
> >> On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 02:33 +0100, Armin K. wrote:
> >>> On 02/04/2013 02:14 AM, Michael C. Robinson wrote:
> root [ ~ ]# /et
On 02/04/2013 02:45 AM, Michael Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-02-03 at 17:38 -0800, Michael Robinson wrote:
>> On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 02:33 +0100, Armin K. wrote:
>>> On 02/04/2013 02:14 AM, Michael C. Robinson wrote:
root [ ~ ]# /etc/init.d/gdm start
/etc/profile.d/gnome.sh: line 1: path
On Sun, 2013-02-03 at 17:38 -0800, Michael Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 02:33 +0100, Armin K. wrote:
> > On 02/04/2013 02:14 AM, Michael C. Robinson wrote:
> > > root [ ~ ]# /etc/init.d/gdm start
> > > /etc/profile.d/gnome.sh: line 1: pathappend: command not found
> > > /etc/profile.d/gn
On Mon, 2013-02-04 at 02:33 +0100, Armin K. wrote:
> On 02/04/2013 02:14 AM, Michael C. Robinson wrote:
> > root [ ~ ]# /etc/init.d/gdm start
> > /etc/profile.d/gnome.sh: line 1: pathappend: command not found
> > /etc/profile.d/gnome.sh: line 2: pathappend: command not found
> > /etc/profile.d/gnom
On 02/04/2013 02:14 AM, Michael C. Robinson wrote:
> root [ ~ ]# /etc/init.d/gdm start
> /etc/profile.d/gnome.sh: line 1: pathappend: command not found
> /etc/profile.d/gnome.sh: line 2: pathappend: command not found
> /etc/profile.d/gnome.sh: line 3: pathappend: command not found
> /etc/profile.d/
In my musings on what turned out to be an incomplete change to
libjpeg-turbo when upgrading from jpegsrc [ .so.8 needed to be
remade ] I wrote:
>
> For once, I had changed my log directory names across the builds,
> so the rebuilds weren't overwriting the previous logs. I wondered
> if nasm was
root [ ~ ]# /etc/init.d/gdm start
/etc/profile.d/gnome.sh: line 1: pathappend: command not found
/etc/profile.d/gnome.sh: line 2: pathappend: command not found
/etc/profile.d/gnome.sh: line 3: pathappend: command not found
/etc/profile.d/gnome.sh: line 4: pathappend: command not found
Startin
On Sun, Feb 03, 2013 at 02:57:21PM -0800, Michael C. Robinson wrote:
> Is it possible to install gnome-shell without installing network manager?
>
> It is not needed on an NFS root system.
>
No idea, but google thinks it is/was possible, at least in debian as
of last April - see
http://debian.2.
Is it possible to install gnome-shell without installing network manager?
It is not needed on an NFS root system.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
--- Em dom, 3/2/13, Pierre M.R. escreveu:
> De: Pierre M.R.
> Assunto: Re: [blfs-support] VLC and Video4Linux (was: [blfs-book] r10987 ...)
> Para: "BLFS Support List"
> Data: Domingo, 3 de Fevereiro de 2013, 6:56
> Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> > --- Em sáb, 2/2/13, Randy McMurchy escreveu:
> >
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> --- Em sáb, 2/2/13, Randy McMurchy escreveu:
>
>> De: Randy McMurchy
>> Assunto: Re: [blfs-support] VLC and Video4Linux (was: [blfs-book] r10987 ...)
>> Para: "BLFS Support List"
>> Data: Sábado, 2 de Fevereiro de 2013, 22:52
>> Fernando de Oliveira wrote these
>> wor
18 matches
Mail list logo
