> Boah. No problems should persist with Glib 2.36.x because that's the
> version I tested NM instructions against. I am not really sure what
> your problem is. You can try removing -Werror by issuing something
> like find . -name "Makefile" | xargs sed "s@ -Werror@@g" after you've
> ran NM conf
On 06/12/2013 10:28 PM, Niels Terp wrote:
>
> Boah. No problems should persist with Glib 2.36.x because that's the version
> I tested NM instructions against. I am not really sure what your problem is.
> You can try removing -Werror by issuing something like find . -name
> "Makefile" | xargs sed "s
> -Oprindelig meddelelse-
> Fra: blfs-support-boun...@linuxfromscratch.org
> [mailto:blfs-support-boun...@linuxfromscratch.org] På vegne af Armin K.
> Sendt: 12. juni 2013 21:31
> Til: BLFS Support List
> Emne: Re: [blfs-support] Can not compile Network Manager
>
> On 06/12/2013 09:27 PM, N
On 06/12/2013 10:16 PM, Armin K. wrote:
> On 06/12/2013 10:06 PM, Niels Terp wrote:
>> Sorry, my mistake. I have now reinstalled Glib pr. the instructions you
>> linked to, and tried to install NM from same instructions, and also tried
>> latest version of NM with this setup. By the way, there is a
On 06/12/2013 10:06 PM, Niels Terp wrote:
>
>
> -Oprindelig meddelelse-
> Fra: blfs-support-boun...@linuxfromscratch.org
> [mailto:blfs-support-boun...@linuxfromscratch.org] På vegne af Armin K.
> Sendt: 12. juni 2013 21:31
> Til: BLFS Support List
> Emne: Re: [blfs-support] Can not compile
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: blfs-support-boun...@linuxfromscratch.org
[mailto:blfs-support-boun...@linuxfromscratch.org] På vegne af Armin K.
Sendt: 12. juni 2013 21:31
Til: BLFS Support List
Emne: Re: [blfs-support] Can not compile Network Manager
On 06/12/2013 09:27 PM, Niels Terp wro
On 06/12/2013 09:59 PM, Cliff McDiarmid wrote:
>> - Original Message -
>> From: Pierre M.R.
>> Sent: 06/11/13 04:27 PM
>> To: BLFS Support List
>> Subject: Re: [blfs-support] Manual connection fails with wpa_supplicant-2.0
>>
>> Cliff McDiarmid wrote:
>>> This works with my old LFS.
>>
>> G
> - Original Message -
> From: Pierre M.R.
> Sent: 06/11/13 04:27 PM
> To: BLFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [blfs-support] Manual connection fails with wpa_supplicant-2.0
>
> Cliff McDiarmid wrote:
> > This works with my old LFS.
>
> Good. Now, when connected to the modem, can you open a
On 06/12/2013 09:27 PM, Niels Terp wrote:
> My LFS was build from LFS Stable 7.3, and has Glibc v. 2.17 - but the same
> version is used in the latest svn. I have searched for a later version, but
> not found anything later than 2.17. If there exists a version 2.36.3, from
> where can it be downloa
> nm-connection.c:105:1: note: in expansion of macro 'G_DEFINE_TYPE'
> G_DEFINE_TYPE (NMConnection, nm_connection, G_TYPE_OBJECT)
> ^
> cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
> make[4]: *** [libnm_util_la-nm-connection.lo] Error 1
> make[4]: Leaving directory
> `/home/niels/Documents/Network
On 06/12/2013 08:31 PM, Niels Terp wrote:
> On 06/12/2013 08:13 PM, Niels Terp wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> I have a problem compiling Network Manager 0.9.8.0 following BLFS
>> 2013-06-05:
>>
>> I do not have IP Tables installed, so I have passed the
>> --without-iptables parameter to config. Config w
On 06/12/2013 08:13 PM, Niels Terp wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I have a problem compiling Network Manager 0.9.8.0 following BLFS
> 2013-06-05:
>
> I do not have IP Tables installed, so I have passed the
> --without-iptables parameter to config. Config works fine but make
> ends after a second or so
>
On 06/12/2013 08:13 PM, Niels Terp wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I have a problem compiling Network Manager 0.9.8.0 following BLFS
> 2013-06-05:
>
> I do not have IP Tables installed, so I have passed the --without-iptables
> parameter to config. Config works fine but make ends after a second or so
> in:
Hi there,
I have a problem compiling Network Manager 0.9.8.0 following BLFS
2013-06-05:
I do not have IP Tables installed, so I have passed the --without-iptables
parameter to config. Config works fine but make ends after a second or so
in:
nm-connection.c:105:1: note: in expansion of macro 'G_D
On Wednesday 12 June 2013 16:36:36 Armin K. wrote:
> On 06/12/2013 05:34 PM, lux-integ wrote:
> > On Wednesday 12 June 2013 16:00:15 Armin K. wrote:
> >> If you run "file /usr/lib/libg{object,lib}-2.0.so*", what does it say?
> >> (Don't forget the asterisk)
> >
> > /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so:
On 06/12/2013 05:34 PM, lux-integ wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 June 2013 16:00:15 Armin K. wrote:
>> If you run "file /usr/lib/libg{object,lib}-2.0.so*", what does it say?
>> (Don't forget the asterisk)
> /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so: symbolic link to
> `libgobject-2.0.so.0.3600.2'
> /usr/lib/li
On Wednesday 12 June 2013 16:00:15 Armin K. wrote:
> If you run "file /usr/lib/libg{object,lib}-2.0.so*", what does it say?
> (Don't forget the asterisk)
/usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so: symbolic link to
`libgobject-2.0.so.0.3600.2'
/usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0:symbolic link to
`lib
On 06/12/2013 04:51 PM, lux-integ wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 June 2013 15:42:01 lux-integ wrote:
>> On Wednesday 12 June 2013 14:12:04 Armin K. wrote:
>>> Don't use g-i 1.37. It's unstable. Use 1.36.0. Also, what does ldd
>>> /usr/lib/libg{object,lib}-2.0.so say?
>>
>> both return
>> 'not a dynamic e
On Wednesday 12 June 2013 15:42:01 lux-integ wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 June 2013 14:12:04 Armin K. wrote:
> > Don't use g-i 1.37. It's unstable. Use 1.36.0. Also, what does ldd
> > /usr/lib/libg{object,lib}-2.0.so say?
>
> both return
> 'not a dynamic executible'
in fact though I am root ldd is
On Wednesday 12 June 2013 14:12:04 Armin K. wrote:
> Don't use g-i 1.37. It's unstable. Use 1.36.0. Also, what does ldd
> /usr/lib/libg{object,lib}-2.0.so say?
both return
'not a dynamic executible'
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.or
On 06/12/2013 02:38 PM, lux-integ wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 June 2013 13:24:52 lux-integ wrote:
>> On Wednesday 12 June 2013 11:36:10 Armin K. wrote:
>>> Run make with V=1 as an argument and post the output.
>>
>> I sent the whole of make V=1 for gobject inrospection-1.37.1 but the
>> moderator see
Em 12-06-2013 06:50, Simon Geard escreveu:
> On Tue, 2013-06-11 at 18:57 -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>> Can now build icedtea-web-1.4, either using OpenJDK-1.7.0.21-2.3.9 or
>> OpenJDK-1.7.0.40-2.4.0, but *only after exiting X* session (lxsession)
>> and runing the build script on a terminal
On Wednesday 12 June 2013 13:24:52 lux-integ wrote:
> On Wednesday 12 June 2013 11:36:10 Armin K. wrote:
> > Run make with V=1 as an argument and post the output.
>
> I sent the whole of make V=1 for gobject inrospection-1.37.1 but the
> moderator seems nonplussed as the message appears too long
On Wednesday 12 June 2013 11:36:10 Armin K. wrote:
> Run make with V=1 as an argument and post the output.
>
I sent the whole of make V=1 for gobject inrospection-1.37.1 but the
moderator seems nonplussed as the message appears too long and awaiits
'moderator aproval' so whilst the moderato
On 06/12/2013 12:30 PM, lux-integ wrote:
> I tried compiling recent gobject introspection releases. The computer has
> these:-
> --cpu AMD64 -2 cores
> --gcc-4.8.1, glibc-2.17,
> I tried 2 versions of glib (
> glib-2.36.1,
> glib-2.36.2 )
> (which builds )
>
> and 3 versions of gobject introspecti
I tried compiling recent gobject introspection releases. The computer has
these:-
--cpu AMD64 -2 cores
--gcc-4.8.1, glibc-2.17,
I tried 2 versions of glib (
glib-2.36.1,
glib-2.36.2 )
(which builds )
and 3 versions of gobject introspection (
gobject-introspection-1.35.9,
gobject-introspectio
On Tue, 2013-06-11 at 18:57 -0300, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> Can now build icedtea-web-1.4, either using OpenJDK-1.7.0.21-2.3.9 or
> OpenJDK-1.7.0.40-2.4.0, but *only after exiting X* session (lxsession)
> and runing the build script on a terminal.
Does it work from an xterm if you unset DISPL
27 matches
Mail list logo
