[blfs-support] MesLib Test Failures

2013-11-29 Thread Dan McGhee
I know that sometimes testing a build is not necessarily a precise indicator of whether a package will work. I do think that it is a general indicator of success. I also have this view, not supported by any technical information, that graphics applications are not as "forgiving" as others. W

Re: [blfs-support] MesLib Test Failures

2013-11-29 Thread Armin K.
On 11/29/2013 04:22 PM, Dan McGhee wrote: >> make check-TESTS >> make[4]: Entering directory >> `/usr/src/MesaLib-9.2.3/Mesa-9.2.3/src/gallium/state_trackers/xvmc' >> make[5]: Entering directory >> `/usr/src/MesaLib-9.2.3/Mesa-9.2.3/src/gallium/state_trackers/xvmc' >> ../../../../bin/test-driver

Re: [blfs-support] MesLib Test Failures

2013-11-29 Thread Dan McGhee
On 11/29/2013 10:25 AM, Armin K. wrote: > You could just add --disable-xvmc. I believe that nobody uses XvMC these > days, vdpau and vaapi made it more or less obsolete. No distros build it > anymore. > That's great info, Armin. Thanks. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-suppor