[blfs-support] MesLib Test Failures

2013-11-29 Thread Dan McGhee
I know that sometimes testing a build is not necessarily a precise indicator of whether a package will work. I do think that it is a general indicator of success. I also have this view, not supported by any technical information, that graphics applications are not as forgiving as others.

Re: [blfs-support] MesLib Test Failures

2013-11-29 Thread Armin K.
On 11/29/2013 04:22 PM, Dan McGhee wrote: make check-TESTS make[4]: Entering directory `/usr/src/MesaLib-9.2.3/Mesa-9.2.3/src/gallium/state_trackers/xvmc' make[5]: Entering directory `/usr/src/MesaLib-9.2.3/Mesa-9.2.3/src/gallium/state_trackers/xvmc' ../../../../bin/test-driver: line 95:

Re: [blfs-support] MesLib Test Failures

2013-11-29 Thread Dan McGhee
On 11/29/2013 10:25 AM, Armin K. wrote: You could just add --disable-xvmc. I believe that nobody uses XvMC these days, vdpau and vaapi made it more or less obsolete. No distros build it anymore. That's great info, Armin. Thanks. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support