On Dec 23, 2013, at 1:13 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Judging from LFS, many people skip things like the preface. I don't
> know how many times users have run into problems because they didn't
> read the preface and run the host requirements script.
I also do note that in LFS, in places where the L
akhiezer wrote:
>> From: Bruce Dubbs
>>> Might it be best addressed in blfs chapter 2 or 3, if it's considered to
>>> be a 'global', 'overview' kind of issue? BLFS users are ~expected to have
>>> processed those chapters. That would help avoid a lot of repetition
>>> elsewhere?
>>
>> From a pract
Pierre Labastie wrote:
> ISTR that at a time, it was said that any page in the X chapter was a prereq
> for the following. That explains why the pages are not in alphabetical order.
> And that's how I implemented it in jhalfs-blfs (same for the KDE chapter,
> actually).
The Xorg pages are arrange
Le 23/12/2013 16:56, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
> akhiezer wrote:
>>> From: William Harrington
>>> To: BLFS Support List
>>> Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 04:07:25 -0600
>>> Subject: [blfs-support] Xorg required dep when following links in BLFS
>>>
>>> Greetings,
>>>
>>> There is a problem with BLFS and Xorg
On Dec 23, 2013, at 9:56 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Might it be best addressed in blfs chapter 2 or 3, if it's
>> considered to
>> be a 'global', 'overview' kind of issue? BLFS users are ~expected
>> to have
>> processed those chapters. That would help avoid a lot of repetition
>> elsewhere?
>
> Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 07:59:22 -0600
> From: Dan McGhee
> To: BLFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [blfs-support] Complete Backup of {,B}LFS
>
.
.
> I am always quite interested in what one word or phrase means to
> different people. [...]
- yes, this cropped up in aforenoted e
> Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 09:56:24 -0600
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> To: BLFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [blfs-support] Xorg required dep when following links in BLFS
>
> >>
.
.
> >
> >
> > Might it be best addressed in blfs chapter 2 or 3, if it's considered to
> > be a 'global', 'over
akhiezer wrote:
>> From: William Harrington
>> To: BLFS Support List
>> Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 04:07:25 -0600
>> Subject: [blfs-support] Xorg required dep when following links in BLFS
>>
>> Greetings,
>>
>> There is a problem with BLFS and Xorg deps when someone follows the
>> links for required
On 12/23/2013 06:01 AM, akhiezer wrote:
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 00:43:13 +0100
From: Aleksandar Kuktin
To: blfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
Subject: Re: [blfs-support] Complete Backup of {,B}LFS
This looks really interesting and I want to "play" with it. But what
I want *is* a clone, an exact
On 12/22/2013 08:55 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Dan McGhee wrote:
>
>> Ubuntu can be, at times, as "hinky" as Windows. As I randomly checked
>> directories and files for permissions. The uid's and gid's for all the
>> package users were indicated for files. However, when I checked my home
>> directory
> From: William Harrington
> To: BLFS Support List
> Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 04:07:25 -0600
> Subject: [blfs-support] Xorg required dep when following links in BLFS
>
> Greetings,
>
> There is a problem with BLFS and Xorg deps when someone follows the
> links for required dependencies of Xorg li
> Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 00:43:13 +0100
> From: Aleksandar Kuktin
> To: blfs-support@linuxfromscratch.org
> Subject: Re: [blfs-support] Complete Backup of {,B}LFS
>
.
.
> > >
> > This looks really interesting and I want to "play" with it. But what
> > I want *is* a clone, an exact
Em 23-12-2013 07:07, William Harrington escreveu:
> Greetings,
>
> There is a problem with BLFS and Xorg deps when someone follows the
> links for required dependencies of Xorg libs.
>
> An example:
>
> When a user attempts to build WIreshark, the require deps will take
> them all the way to
Greetings,
There is a problem with BLFS and Xorg deps when someone follows the
links for required dependencies of Xorg libs.
An example:
When a user attempts to build WIreshark, the require deps will take
them all the way to xorg-proto.
I have also been told that util-macros isn't required
14 matches
Mail list logo
