[blfs-support] Apparmor

2014-04-01 Thread Casey Daniels
Hello, I was curious if any one has had any success working with Apparmor on a BLFS System? Thank You, Casey -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: [blfs-support] eth0, enp1s0 ?

2013-10-23 Thread Casey Daniels
On 10/23/2013 11:16 AM, Dr.-Ing. Edgar Alwers wrote: > On Wednesday 23 October 2013 10:30:17 Casey Daniels wrote: >> you have edit you 70-persistent-net.rules and fix the entry that >> says eth0 (which should be your old ethernet adapter) and change the mac >> address to th

Re: [blfs-support] eth0, enp1s0 ?

2013-10-23 Thread Casey Daniels
On 10/23/2013 10:18 AM, Dr.-Ing. Edgar Alwers wrote: > Hi all, > > I work with BLFS, Kernel-3.8.5, KDE-4.10.2. > As my motherboard went defect, I had to exchange it by a new ASRock G31M. So > far, everything is working OK. However, I would appreciate, if someone can > give me some explanations on

Re: [blfs-support] OpenLDAP

2013-10-22 Thread Casey Daniels
On 10/22/2013 01:52 PM, Casey Daniels wrote: > I was trying to get OpenLDAP up and running, and I had a question about > the install instructions included with the BLFS Book. Do I understand > correctly that if I were to follow the instructions word for word, that > I should be abl

[blfs-support] OpenLDAP

2013-10-22 Thread Casey Daniels
I was trying to get OpenLDAP up and running, and I had a question about the install instructions included with the BLFS Book. Do I understand correctly that if I were to follow the instructions word for word, that I should be able to get the SLAPD daemon to run (Of course not usefully, nor nec

Re: [blfs-support] Squid Configure

2013-10-13 Thread Casey Daniels
On 10/13/2013 12:40 PM, Richard Melville wrote: On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 02:03:43AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > > Glad you were right - I've just posted that this seemed unlikely to > be the error, but if it builds then you are sorted. > > /me resolves never to touch squi

Re: [blfs-support] Squid Configure

2013-10-12 Thread Casey Daniels
On 10/12/2013 11:59 AM, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 10:38:19AM -0400, Casey Daniels wrote: >> On 10/12/2013 10:18 AM, Ken Moffat wrote: >>> On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 02:03:43AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: >>>>Glad you were right - I've just

Re: [blfs-support] Squid Configure

2013-10-12 Thread Casey Daniels
On 10/12/2013 10:18 AM, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Sat, Oct 12, 2013 at 02:03:43AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: >> Glad you were right - I've just posted that this seemed unlikely to >> be the error, but if it builds then you are sorted. >> >> /me resolves never to touch squid with the proverbial barge-

Re: [blfs-support] Squid Configure

2013-10-11 Thread Casey Daniels
On 10/11/2013 09:01 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 08:41:03PM -0400, Casey Daniels wrote: >> On 10/11/2013 05:03 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> Casey Daniels wrote: >>> >> here is what maybe Ken might be looking for, I have to look into the >&

Re: [blfs-support] Squid Configure

2013-10-11 Thread Casey Daniels
its missing libnfnetlink.so.0, which installs in /usr/local/lib, I created a symbolic link from the /lib and everything is fine. Casey -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: [blfs-support] Squid Configure

2013-10-11 Thread Casey Daniels
On 10/11/2013 05:03 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Casey Daniels wrote: > >> Okay so I'm a little confused as to where we stand on this issue is it a >> dead end and there is no support, or is it just going to take time for >> you to look into something? > This is a p

Re: [blfs-support] Squid Configure

2013-10-11 Thread Casey Daniels
On 10/11/2013 02:40 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 10:59:12AM -0400, Casey Daniels wrote: >> Did a search for those items you asked and this is what it comes up >> with. I copied from what looked like the last good entry above it to >> where it started

Re: [blfs-support] Squid Configure

2013-10-11 Thread Casey Daniels
> Too few people to build every package and to keep them up to date. Yes I know, but when you have an awesome project you always want more from it. > > Also, which LFS version ? I see that Arch use the following: ># gcc 4.6 doesn't support -fhuge-objects. >sed '/^HUGE_OBJE

Re: [blfs-support] Squid Configure

2013-10-11 Thread Casey Daniels
On 10/11/2013 06:00 AM, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:11:59AM -0400, Casey Daniels wrote: >> On 10/10/2013 11:35 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 11:09:09PM -0400, Casey Daniels wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> I'm

Re: [blfs-support] Squid Configure

2013-10-10 Thread Casey Daniels
On 10/10/2013 11:35 PM, Ken Moffat wrote: > On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 11:09:09PM -0400, Casey Daniels wrote: >> Hello, >> I'm trying to compile Squid 3.3.9 from Source and I keep getting the >> error >> >> "checking size of size_t ... configure erro

[blfs-support] Squid Configure

2013-10-10 Thread Casey Daniels
Hello, I'm trying to compile Squid 3.3.9 from Source and I keep getting the error "checking size of size_t ... configure error in '/sources/squid-3.3.9' Configure error: cannot compute size of (size_t). here is the top of my config.log I have the whole thing, its just huge and I also piped

[blfs-support] Wireshark and GTK Warning

2013-10-09 Thread Casey Daniels
Okay, Trying to figure out how to get wireshark up and loaded. Every time I try to start wireshark I get a warning stating "GTK Warning - Can't open display:" Searched around a little bit found a DISPLAY=:0.0, EXPORT DISPLAY and that doesn't get me any where it changes the warning to "GTK W

[blfs-support] IPV-6 Support

2013-09-30 Thread Casey Daniels
I was just playing around with my LFS Box (which is going to operate as a Router/Firewall/A few network services (NTP, SquidProxy, et C) and wanted to add IPv6 support to it, I got the tunnel to HE electric up and running, and everything but was looking to add the IPv6 address to the internal N

Re: Questions on Upgrading and Package Management

2011-02-08 Thread Casey Daniels
> I have no opinion on your preferred package management. In theory, > build once, run on multiple machines of the same architecture > *probably* works. Certainly, LFS does its best to build down to a > "lowest common denominator" (i486 when most people with 32-bit x86 > can probably use i686).

Questions on Upgrading and Package Management

2011-02-07 Thread Casey Daniels
I finally was able to finish my first LFS system and it was a fun time. Now I have some questions. I plan on building my second build that I actually plan on using but didn't understand much about Package Management or Upgrading. From the Short info in the Book it looks like the Symlink Met