Re: Wrong permissions for user home directories

2005-09-20 Thread Dan Osterrath
Randy McMurchy schrieb: >>umask 0077 >>mkdir /home/username && >>useradd -m username > install -m700 -d /home/username > useradd -m username > chown username/usergroup /home/username (this was added) Then I suggest install -m700 -o -g /home/ && useradd -m signature.asc Description: OpenPGP dig

Re: gcc 2.95.x

2005-08-26 Thread Dan Osterrath
Declan Moriarty schrieb: > You might need gcc-2.95 to make gcc-2.95 :-/. Very nice circular dependency. :-( > If you just want libstdc++.so.5, do you want it attached to an email? No thanks, I got it from gcc 3.3.6 already. > Have you installed Openoffice? You may have libstdc++.so.5 in the >

lowlevellock.h (was Re: gcc 2.95.x)

2005-08-26 Thread Dan Osterrath
But then anoher question: Why does /usr/include/bits/stdio-lock.h from glibc-2.3.4-20040701 include lowlevellock.h, which does not exist on my system? Did it exists in the kernel headers which were deleted after successfully compiling glibc? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature --

Re: gcc 2.95.x

2005-08-26 Thread Dan Osterrath
Andrew Benton schrieb: > Dan Osterrath wrote: >> I need to install libstdc++.so.5 on my LFS system > Isn't libstdc++.so.5 installed by gcc-3.3? Indeed, this is built by gcc 3.2 and 3.3. Thanx for the tip. /me asks himself how could his mind got to 2.95.x... signature.asc Des

gcc 2.95.x

2005-08-26 Thread Dan Osterrath
Hi, I need to install libstdc++.so.5 on my LFS system (6.0-testing-20040901). Unfortunately this gcc version was removed from the blfs book so I tried the instructions from blfs 5.0. I added another patch for the trap posix incompatibility but when compiling it stops with the following error: ---

Re: displaying png and mng images with firefox

2005-07-14 Thread Dan Osterrath
Ken Moffat schrieb: > A little while ago, I made a throw-away comment that the test pages for > png and mng at http://gjuyn.xs4all.nl/libmng/MNGsuite/index.html didn't > seem to work. > > Tonight I had reason to go back there, this time using konqueror, and > they're working pretty well, but still

Re: Firefox bombs on this site

2005-05-25 Thread Dan Osterrath
Declan Moriarty schrieb: >http://www.tv3.ie > >I have firefox-1.0. Have I the problem or have they? > > Works fine here with Firefox 1.0.4, Windows XP. (Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de-DE; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050511 Firefox/1.0.4) Not tested on linux because of lacking X server. ;-) si