On 2/12/07, BLFS User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 12:26 +0530, jignesh gangani wrote:
> >I have just one question. What style of package management
> > system did you use? (ie. symlink style or preloaded library style or
> > database style) and What software did y
Ahh the reason i ask is cause the dbus site says they were removed
from the main install
On 10/2/06, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 10/2/06, Henry christenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ahh yes i see now thank you. I really wish the dev version would go
> fina
Ahh yes i see now thank you. I really wish the dev version would go
final but im sure your still working on it. Also does it include how
to install the glib bindings ?
On 10/2/06, Simon Geard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 19:20 -0700, Henry christenson wrote:
&g
Severe issues with xfce4.4RC1 and dbus not being in LFS or BLFS
ive never herd of dbus untill i needed dbus-glib-1. Now i wish i
never have. For one in order to install dbus-glib-1 you need to
install dbus and then get it configured some how. the dbus web page
at xfreedesktop.org gives little
I figured out what was causing my issue. It was the \ in the command
sequence. I removed them and it built properly.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
I have copied and pasted the commands from the current BLFS book
online as well as the one i have downloaded and im getting a strange
configure message.
"configure: error: can only configure for one host and one target at a time"
Does anyone know why this is doing this. Forgive me for not posti
> Hey do you know what package has ifconfig in it ?
Net-tools. Another way you can find installed programs in the blfs
book is to go to this page:
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/longindex.html
And search for ifconfig. (Watch out, the page is a monster if you
have a slow connect
> Why does BLFS install Inetutils again ?
>
> Its installed in the LFS book.
Only the clients are installed in LFS. BLFS provides instructions to
install the servers as well.
--
Randy
Ahh yes i see now BLFS doesent pass the --disable-servers option but
does mention it in the command expl
I just got a simple question not sure if its sutible for support but
here it is.
Why does BLFS install Inetutils again ?
Its installed in the LFS book.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above infor
I posted 25 lines of text and this is not good for you ?
Im confused.
I snip all the stuff out and people complain. I snip most of it out
and people complain its too long. Please figure out what you want.
thanks
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.l
On 5/8/06, Jeremy Byron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
himanshu pahuja wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I have almost completed constructing BLFS Ver 6.1 , now I am looking to
> burn the constructed system in CD so that I can use it
> as a distribution on my different PCs .
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/b
Ok started over and now getting another compile error in nautilus. I
was able to compile nautilus before with 2.10 but 2.14 just refuses to
compile. here is the output.
make[2]: Entering directory `/home/exvor/unpacked/nautilus-2.14.1/src'
/opt/gnome-2.14/bin/orbit-idl-2 -I
/opt/gnome-2.14/share/
I'm guessing if you have don't have the new ORBit2, there'll be at
least a handful of things to recompile that depend on it. Off the top
of my head, libbonobo, GConf and gnome-vfs. Those are all pretty
critical to gnome.
--
Dan
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: h
> cc1: note: obsolete option -I- used, please use -iquote instead
> :8:63: error:
Looks like it's trying to use orbit-idl-2 2.12.2. What version of
ORBit2 are you using? You probably need a 2.14 version. I've got
2.14.0 here. Haven't checked for a new version yet.
--
Dan
Sorry Gmail does t
On 5/4/06, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/4/06, Henry christenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> oops i forgot to mention that i was using CLFS thats using gcc 4x.
> current blfs version is 2.10.
Do you mean gcc-4.1 (and glibc-2.4)? If you have a pure64 set
On 5/4/06, Henry christenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/4/06, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Henry christenson wrote these words on 05/04/06 20:56 CST:
>
> > oops i forgot to mention that i was using CLFS thats using gcc 4x.
> > current
On 5/4/06, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Henry christenson wrote these words on 05/04/06 20:56 CST:
> oops i forgot to mention that i was using CLFS thats using gcc 4x.
> current blfs version is 2.10.
Sigh.
The above is meaningless. I was trying to be helpful. Yo
Glad to hear you fixed the problem. Just for clarity, though, the
above would depend on how you installed X. On a multilib system, it
may actually be in lib64.
Actually oddly enough on a pure64 u still have a lib and lib64 with
most of the important stuff in lib64 not lib
Or mabye i installe
On 5/4/06, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Henry christenson wrote these words on 05/04/06 20:33 CST:
> One im not complaining just pointing out something incase somone else
> goes though all the trouble.
>
> if you follow the current lfs you probably will have no lu
On 5/1/06, Dan Winkler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
this is a long over due reply but the problem was solved in the end it was
user error=/
i first had a syntax error in the /etc/group file which resulted in my user
not being properly added to the audio group
this once corrected removed a great d
On 5/2/06, Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 12:28:35PM +, Warren Wilder wrote:
> I have a question about scaling the frequency of the cpu clock cycle.
>
> This isn't in the book, but I can't find much info on it otherwise.
>
*cough* I did write a hint about it, bu
>
>I had the same problem, here is what I found out:
>The gnome-mixer-applet is missing !
>Thats why gnome-panel (or gnome-menu - don't know for sure) is showing
>an error-dialog, which is broken...
>
>There are several ways to fix this:
>1. Install the missing applet ( sounds easy, but I didn't m
One im not complaining just pointing out something incase somone else
goes though all the trouble.
if you follow the current lfs you probably will have no luck getting
gnome working.
with gcc4 you need a whole slew of patchs and use newer packages from
gnome. one example is control center. It r
Ive been in GTK app hell for days now :( Think im starting to find my way tho.
On 4/29/06, Henry christenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
LOL disregard its under general libraries not gnome. You sir are a
sneeky one :P sorry for the post.
On 4/29/06, Henry christenson <[EMAIL PROTECTE
LOL disregard its under general libraries not gnome. You sir are a
sneeky one :P sorry for the post.
On 4/29/06, Henry christenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Libglade is not listed anywhere else but in the 1.4 stuff. Ive looked
though all of the things listed in the book for gnome and f
Libglade is not listed anywhere else but in the 1.4 stuff. Ive looked
though all of the things listed in the book for gnome and fail to see
the updated one listed. Do you have it combined with another package
or possibly its been renamed to something else ?
I'm not quite sure why I'm responding
You do relize that the version of libglade in the blfs book is from
september 2001 right?
there up to like version 2.01 now !
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
>
> > We have a problem with SPAM on the BLFS lists. I am proposing that we
> > 'close' the lists to non-subscribed members. The main issue is that
> > list members who post from multiple email accounts will have to
> > subscribe for each account.
> >
> > Non-member email would go to /dev/null
W
> the documentation listing supported cards and features needs a major
> facelift however if you view the xorg7 change log you will see ATI got some
> major work done to it even more so for the radeon series =)
>
> _
> Express yoursel
> Just FYI for everyone. No GCC-4 patch is required for Firefox 1.5.x.
> The only patch you should need is an NSS patch if you use system
> installed NSS/NSPR.
>
> --
> Randy
>
> rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.28] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3]
> [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [L
On 4/9/06, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tor Olav Stava wrote these words on 04/09/06 13:54 CST:
> > Randy McMurchy wrote:
> >> Firefox runs like a champ. I believe the issue you quote above, Dan,
> >> is related to X-org 6.9/7.0. Tor said he too has 6.8.2 installed.
> >>
> > Have you
On 4/1/06, Dan Winkler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Folling the instrctions set forth in the current BLFS svn in the Xorg7.0
> section:
>
> the install went wonderfully all seems to be working properly out the gate
> (including my DRM eg no errors
> I run the test X -config ~/xorg.conf.new
>
> and
> On 4/7/06, Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Normally, I would suggest that you should export PKG_CONFIG_PATH so
> > that it includes the directory where the .pc files from these packages
> > are installed. The only directory pkgconfig knows about automatically
> > is /usr/lib/pkgco
Yes radeon FB driver in the kernel is Unstable as can be. I have
brought this up to the kernel devs more then once. They tried fixing
it but still causes issues. Most notably will lock the entire system
up on some chips.
I had this issues using the radeon FB and X11's open source radeon driver
Yea seperating Data and OS is a must when doing backups. Makes the OS
one faster too :P. Usually i have my home and /usr/local on diffrent
parttions and have 3 backups. One for data one for user instaled
programs and one for base OS.
Usually i make a Basic backup of the LFS system before i mov
Wasent that what I sugested 4 days ago :)
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On 3/29/06, Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Mar 2006, Henry christenson wrote:
>
> >
> > after applying the patch to glib-1.2.10
> > ./configure --prefix=/usr
> >
> > checking host system type... Invalid configureation
> > &#x
ot some information online that says that some packages have
issues with this host name. x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu it says to add
that in the config.guess somewhere but im not sure where i would add
this or what to use as a --host= option for configure.
On 3/29/06, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTE
A simple grammer change would reslove the issue. here is how it
appears in the book.
Required Patch (if compiled using GCC-3.4.x)
This tells readers If you are compileing with any varient of gcc 3.4
you need this patch.
all that would need to be done to reslove this from being posted again is.
Problem in the configure. Getting ltconfig errors.
Im using CLFS-pure64 and it says that my machine type is not found.
X86_64-unknown
Any ideas ?
Im thinking that things are gonna need to be added to BLFS when using
CLFS or pure 64 bit systems.
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo
Are you using cups here for a local printer or a remote >??
On 6/12/05, Andrew Benton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dr. Edgar Alwers wrote:
> > cups error_log ( set to debug ) does not show any errors. Cups is of course
> > running. I found one "google" to this issue, but the advice was to check
On 6/11/05, Declan Moriarty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For my sins, I repair hardware for a (meagre) living, and my main
> instrument is a pinpoint machine which has an industrial pc card running
> specialised software and driving a set of ISA cards (I have one
> controller card, 3 driver boards,
If you manually load the driver with modprobe does it give you the
same issue with eth0 not found ? when doing a ifconfig eth0 "Ip
address"
and of course replace "ip address" with a valid address like
192.168.0.88 or something :)
On 6/10/05, Dan McGhee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know w
43 matches
Mail list logo
