manually
> but perhaps you can also consider to downgrade to the latest
> stable version (1.4.0a)
>
I corrected it but compilation keeps failing. I decided to compile
without OpenEXR support, and it compiled just fine. If or when I really
need OpenEXR, I'll try 1.4.0a.
Thanks a lot.
On Mon, 9 Apr 2007, Alessandro Alocci wrote:
> On Monday 09 April 2007 10:39:24 Jorge Almeida wrote:
>> I can't compile kdegraphics-3.5.6. I installed aRts, kdelibs and kdebase.
>> The config command is "DO_NOT_COMPILE="kio_kamera kpovmodeler kooka"
>>
ico.cpp:70: warning: unused parameter 'what'
kfile_exr.cpp: In member function 'virtual bool
KExrPlugin::readInfo(KFileMetaInfo&, uint)':
kfile_exr.cpp:229: error: 'hasutcOffset' was not declared in this scope
kfile_exr.cpp: At global scope:
On Sun, 1 Apr 2007, Tijnema ! wrote:
> On 4/1/07, Jorge Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sun, 1 Apr 2007, Tijnema ! wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> It's true, free broadband internet from google :)
>>>
>>> Have a l
On Sun, 1 Apr 2007, Tijnema ! wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It's true, free broadband internet from google :)
>
> Have a look at this page:
> http://www.google.com/tisp
>
> Start now with installing:
> http://www.google.com/tisp/install.html
>
You do know what day is t
etc. You can download the 55 MB JDK and build on your box.
>
According to the BLFS book, to build jdk from source one has to install
the binary version. Maybe I misunderstood, but then I never tried to
hide my ignorance, I only try to do what I can about it.
>
> Jignesh D. Gangani
>
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007, Randy McMurchy wrote:
>
> I suppose we just have to A2D. I find the site easy to navigate. Text
> or graphical. And as far as the license policy goes, you must use a
> browser to accept the license. So what?
Well, it would be so much easier with wget...Using a browser to make
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007, Tijnema ! wrote:
>> With the commands in the book, kdelibs refuses to "./config". But there
>> is a --without-arts option for configure. It compiled successfully. Is
>> MCOP used for something unrelated to sound support?
>
> MCOP is the Multimedia Communication Protocol, so it
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Jorge Almeida wrote these words on 03/25/07 10:26 CST:
>
>> () OK. I overlooked the Continue button, which doesn't appear in
>> the graphic version.
>> Thanks.
>
> Glad I could help. Now, about the original subject
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Jorge Almeida wrote these words on 03/25/07 09:55 CST:
>
>> Well, I had the Accept field with an X. (I checked again!) Pressing Ret
>> does nothing. I proceed to the link to select the binary and then Ret
>> does nothing.
>
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Jorge Almeida wrote these words on 03/25/07 09:33 CST:
>
>> I did that. I had no trouble to reach the proper link, but upon pressing
>> return it doesn't start downloading, it just jumps to the start of the
>> page.
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Jorge Almeida wrote these words on 03/25/07 08:02 CST:
>
>> OK, 1.5.10_11 will be. One of these days. Not today, of course, because
>> I'm working remote and Sun doesn't allow me to download it with lynx,
>> let al
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Jorge Almeida wrote these words on 03/25/07 07:29 CST:
>
>> If you're sure it doesn't hurt, I'll install it. I usually avoid
>> development versions, unless there is a good reason to try it.
>
> I'm not sure
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007, Tijnema ! wrote:
> On 3/25/07, Jorge Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Is it really necessary to install aRts in order to install kdelibs? I
>> want (part of) KDE in a workstation that has no sound hardware. The
>> book says aRts install _neces
KDE without aRts (OTOH, who
knows whether missing aRts will entail some difficult to diagnose
problem...)
--
Jorge Almeida
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 3/23/07, Jorge Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Googling around, I found that it wants a directory /usr/X11R6/lib. I had
>> xorg in /opt/xorg, and /etc/ld.so.conf has:
>> # Begin /etc/ld.so.
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, Dan Nicholson wrote:
>
> OK. I guess this was probably an oversight when writing the Xorg-7
> pages. Although most modern applications will use pkg-config to find
> out how to build against X, we should probably include the
> compatibility links by default like was done for Xo
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, Dan Nicholson wrote:
>
> OK, here's the issue. For whatever reason, gcc is not being told to
> link in /opt/xorg/lib. If things were working properly, you'd see
> -L/opt/xorg/lib around where it says -L/usr/X11/lib. Something in the
> Python build isn't adding this.
>
> Actual
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, Dan Nicholson wrote:
>
> You should just be able to look at the log and find the relevant text
> before the "ld: fails ..." part. Did you say you have tk on your
> system? Maybe it's making the crappy assumptions about where to find
Yes, I have tcl and tk (only because they ar
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007, Dan Nicholson wrote:
>> Creating a /usr/X11R6/ symlink to /opt/xorg solved the problem. Maybe
>> the book should mention the need to create a /usr/X11R6 symlink?
>
> You shouldn't need to do that. If you made that symlink, it would only
> be working around a bug in some other
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007, Tijnema ! wrote:
> On 3/21/07, Jorge Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Wed, 21 Mar 2007, Tijnema ! wrote:
>>
>>> If you can Mesa install without any problems, do it :) If you get
>>> errors and stuff and takes too much time, yo
On Wed, 21 Mar 2007, Lauri Kasanen wrote:
>
>
> I think you missed the driver for your ide chipset. If there is one, then
> don't enable generic ide chipset support, it might prevent dma. The generic
> driver has no dma support of any kind..
>
You're right. I had enabled "generic/default IDE chi
DMA_AUTO=y
# CONFIG_SCSI_PDC_ADMA is not set
CONFIG_IEEE1394_SBP2_PHYS_DMA=y
So, what did I miss?
(It's not a hardware problem, because DMA is on when I boot Gentoo in
the same box.)
--
Jorge Almeida
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linux
On Fri, 9 Mar 2007, Alberto Hernando wrote:
El Thursday 08 March 2007 11:46:34 Jorge Almeida escribió:
I'm trying xorg in BLFS stable. I can startx and it works (the default
wm appears, with the xterm and the clock). The problem is that I can't
switch virtual consoles when I'
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Shawn wrote:
> On March 8, 2007, Jorge Almeida wrote:
>> I suppose I must try that next monday. I will also try "us"
>> XkbLayout. Until then I'm connected via ssh to the gentoo part and
>> then chroot to the LFS part...
>> BTW, I have
On Thu, 8 Mar 2007, Lauri Kasanen wrote:
>
> I think you have
> Option "DontVTSwitch"
> in your xorg.conf.
>
Nope. It's commented. Anyway, the xorg.conf file is just a copy of the
xorg.conf I have (in working conditions) in the Gentoo part of the box.
Jorge
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman
l-Alt-F1 prints 'P' in the xterm window, Ctrl-Alt-F2 prints 'Q', etc.
I installed xorg in /opt/xorg. I tried the nvidia and the nv drivers.
Both work and the problem is the same.
TIA.
--
Jorge Almeida
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: h
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Dan Nicholson wrote:
>
> The order definitely matters. That's why the wget list is ordered in a
> specific way so that the dependencies are resolved.
>
Ah, OK. I didn't understand how the list was made.
Thanks.
Jorge
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-sup
On Tue, 27 Feb 2007, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 2/27/07, Jorge Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I'm trying to install xorg, following the current stable version of the
>> BLFS book. I'm using "/opt/xorg" as $XORG_PREFIX.
>> I can't
config man page for more details.
And what is the "x11" package?
TIA.
--
Jorge Almeida
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Mon, 5 Feb 2007, Tushar Teredesai wrote:
> On 2/5/07, Jorge Almeida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is if safe to just recompile shadow? (I mean, is there some post-install
> > to do?)
>
> Recompiling shadow should do it. There are no additional steps involved.
31 matches
Mail list logo
