Re: lfs_next_to_existing_systems: fstab

2007-07-11 Thread Matthias B.
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 01:48:22 +0200 "Lieven De Keyzer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've installed LFS under /home/me/lfs . /dev/hda7 has /home as > mount-point. Now, If I'm not mistaken, I should be able to boot this, > according to > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hints/downloads/files/lfs_next_

Re: startx problem with more_control_and_pkg_man

2006-12-24 Thread Matthias B.
On Sat, 23 Dec 2006 16:41:26 -0800 Arden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Check the output of list_suspicious_files_from it should give you a detailed list of all files that have suspicious permissions, including setuid and setgid binaries (provided you use the user=group scheme, so that the files h

Re: Updated Hints - Where to send them?

2006-11-18 Thread Matthias B.
On Sat, 18 Nov 2006 09:30:48 +0100 "Matthias B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 21:35:03 - "spike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > Following on from what Tushar wrote, and reading from the hint page > > "To submit

Re: Updated Hints - Where to send them?

2006-11-18 Thread Matthias B.
On Mon, 13 Nov 2006 21:35:03 - "spike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Following on from what Tushar wrote, and reading from the hint page "To > submit or update a hint, send an e-mail to the hint mailing list. From > there it will be picked up by the hint maintainer, who will update the > hint i

Re: Updated Hints - Where to send them?

2006-11-04 Thread Matthias B.
On Fri, 3 Nov 2006 14:04:52 -0600 "Tushar Teredesai" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 11/3/06, Matthias B. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > For the package user hint, all 3 of these things would be copyright > > infringement. Please respect my choice of lic

Re: Updated Hints - Where to send them?

2006-11-04 Thread Matthias B.
On Fri, 3 Nov 2006 23:00:43 - "spike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I must admit that I never spotted the type of licence until after I'd > completed the work. It's generally a good idea to check the license of a work closely, before building on it. It's a mistake to believe that everything pr

Re: Updated Hints - Where to send them?

2006-11-03 Thread Matthias B.
On Thu, 2 Nov 2006 20:45:53 - "spike" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've just built my third LFS system (second in a couple of months due to > some unfortunate hardware failures). > > For the second time I used the "How to build a LFS 6.1 system using the > LFS live CD as your host" hint and t

Re: how to compile sources for win ?

2006-08-17 Thread Matthias B.
On Wed, 16 Aug 2006 22:00:39 +0200 kriss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > cause i can't let the only thing i love in win Maybe it'll run in Wine. Have you tried? MSB -- Want to learn long division in ternary? Contact me at ICQ 2101001122212.01/0.2 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listi

Re: how to compile sources for win ?

2006-08-16 Thread Matthias B.
On Tue, 15 Aug 2006 13:48:43 +0200 kriss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > the developer don't want to do the port > so that's why i'm asking about porting borland c++ > to GCC > i don't say hey you people of {,a,b,c}lfs compile that for me ! Looks like you're out of luck then. This is nothing that yo

Re: Alt-Gr key problem under emacs

2006-07-21 Thread Matthias B.
If it's everywhere in X and Xfce doesn't mess with the keys, then I think it can only be a mapping problem. Do you have a ~/.Xmodmap file? Run > xev What does it output when you press AltGr. For my layout it's KeyPress event, serial 24, synthetic NO, window 0x1a1, root 0x2d, subw 0x0,

Alt-Gr key problem under emacs

2006-07-17 Thread Matthias B.
On Mon, 19 Jun 2006 01:38:06 +0200 Nicolas FRANCOIS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi. > > This is driving me crazy. I posted on french groups, browsed Google... > now I'm addressing a larger population, hoping to solve this. > > I've upgraded my LFS to a recent version (6.1.1 SVN, in fact). I use

Re: LFS does not save bash history on shutdown

2006-06-17 Thread Matthias B.
On Tue, 13 Jun 2006 12:23:03 -0600 Jason Aeschilman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Bash history is not saved on shutdown. I have commented out the line > "unset HISTFILE" from /etc/profile so now history is saved for root, but > > it only works when I log out of a terminal. If I reboot or shutdo

Re: Howto for non-standard paths???

2006-03-04 Thread Matthias B.
On Sat, 4 Mar 2006 12:56:18 +0100 "Matthias B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A more elegant way to do this might be unionfs. I've browsed the unionfs archives a bit and it seems that an LFSer has already tried this: http://www.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu/pipermail/unionfs/2006-

Re: Howto for non-standard paths???

2006-03-04 Thread Matthias B.
On Wed, 1 Mar 2006 21:06:09 -0600 (CST) Alex <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On the other hand, I'm considering installing each package to a separate > > directory and upon each installation/removal, re-populating a fake set > of standard "/usr" directories with symbolic links to the real files.

Re: bash upgrade issue with list_package

2006-02-19 Thread Matthias B.
On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 00:47:53 -0600 "Van Van Cleave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Solved the problem and managed to make myself feel quite dumb in the > process. Simply modify the script so that the line > > sed $'s/.\b\\(.\\)/\\1/g;s/\x1b[^m]\\+m//g' | > > reads > > sed -e 's/.\b\\(.\\

Re: Bash history keys (C-r), (C-s)

2005-12-04 Thread Matthias B.
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 23:07:40 -0800 (PST) Brandin Creech <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >forward-search-history (C-s) > Search forward starting at the current line and > moving `down' through the history as necessary. > This is an incremental sea

Re: Forged Helo (was KPlayer ...?)

2005-06-01 Thread Matthias B.
On Tue, 31 May 2005 21:29:25 -0400 Craig Colton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since this post I've tried every concievable combination of hostnames > and addresses to try to satisfy SA's FORGED_RCVD_HELO test - no luck. I had the forged HELO problem with SourceForge's SpamAssassin, until I config

Re: Libstdc++

2005-05-05 Thread Matthias B.
On Wed, 4 May 2005 22:26:41 +0100 (BST) Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Worst case, I guess you might have to build a 3.3 gcc (3.3.4 or 3.3.5) > and use that to build 2.95.3. It's worse than that. The C++ components of gcc 2.95 don't compile with recent glibcs. MSB -- Assassins do it

Re: Libstdc++

2005-05-04 Thread Matthias B.
Take mine: http://www.schneepoesie.de/libstdc++-3-libc6.2-2-2.10.0.so.bz2 MSB -- Those of you who think you know everything are very annoying to those of us who do. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See

Re: Package Management Rears Its Ugly Head

2005-04-14 Thread Matthias B.
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 18:03:52 -0500 Dan McGhee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks Matthias and Nick for your comments and suggestions. > > I've reached the point at which I must take some action. I think that > I'm going to go with the package-user concept of management. My only > problem at th

Re: Package Management Rears Its Ugly Head

2005-04-09 Thread Matthias B.
On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 19:27:34 -0500 Dan McGhee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > feature. However, the hint "more_control_and_pkg_man" makes a lot of > sense. And I want to try it. But before I start I have some questions. > > First Question: > > I'm not a fan of keeping unused sources around.