old include files that do not play well with the
version of the subsystem that your're trying to install; hence it wants to
replace these include files with its own, newer, versions.
Look:
http://ieee80211.sourceforge.net/#issues
HTH,
uli
--
Uli Fahrenberg --
Alexander E. Patrakov, May 15, 15:25 +0600:
Uli Fahrenberg wrote:
I'm trying to compile detex-2.7,
I was able to compile it using the following commands:
Thank you, this worked (had to change -ll to -lfl though because Gentoo
doesn't install libl). Just for reference, here
7;s my system being hosed or what?
Cheers,
Uli
--
Uli Fahrenberg -- http://www.math.aau.dk/~uli
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
rejecting them is of course better and invalidates the old argument
somewhat. But it puts extra workload on whoever it is that is the
moderator.
I'm up for helping with moderation btw, if there's need for an extra
hands.
Uli
--
Uli Fahrenberg -- http://www.math.aau.dk/~uli
--
eating symlink trees, you might consider my (old,
abandoned, but well-documented and working) *reflect* script:
http://www.math.aau.dk/~uli/reflect/
HTH,
Uli
--
Uli Fahrenberg -- http://www.math.aau.dk/~uli
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linux
mess-mate, Nov 5, 18:23 +0100:
Uli Fahrenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Allard Welter, Nov 1, 17:02 +0100:
|
| >This looks like a bash (non-)thingy Have you checked the startup scripts for
the occurrence
| >of "[: ==" ? I can't recal a colon being part of any co
en bash complains that the [ is followed by an == operator.
This kind of problem can be prevented by instead of the above test saying
[ X$X == Xblah ] ...
but again, without additional info this is difficult to debug.
HTH,
uli
--
Uli Fahrenberg -- http://www.math.aau.dk/~uli
--
http://li
/90
works for both.
HTH,
uli
--
Uli Fahrenberg -- http://www.math.aau.dk/~uli
GETCO 2005 -- http://www.math.aau.dk/~uli/getco05/
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Randy McMurchy, Aug 18, 13:32 -0500:
Uli Fahrenberg wrote these words on 08/18/05 13:29 CST:
Also, building X while in chroot is normally not recommended, you
should be booted into your new shiny LFS system for doing that.
Just out of curiosity more than anything: why?
OK this might just
your new shiny LFS system for doing that.
Cheers,
Uli
--
Uli Fahrenberg -- http://www.math.aau.dk/~uli
GETCO 2005 -- http://www.math.aau.dk/~uli/getco05/
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above
try to build it anyway and see
if your problem goes away?
HTH,
Uli
--
Uli Fahrenberg -- http://www.math.aau.dk/~uli
GETCO 2005 -- http://www.math.aau.dk/~uli/getco05/
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe
from this package is that the -p
switch always returns unknown. The following patch fixes this behavior for
Intel architectures:
patch -Np1 -i ../coreutils-5.2.1-uname-2.patch
\endquote
Why this doesn't seem to work on your machine is a good question...
Cheers,
Uli
--
Uli Fahrenbe
using plain old ssh (I think).
There's a protocol called FISH, so I guess this is what KDE is using.
Googling for it is not easy, but I found
http://www2.codegnome.org:59321/geeklog/2004/04/
uli
--
Uli Fahrenberg -- http://www.math.aau.dk/~uli
GETCO 2005 -- http://www.math.aau.dk/~
our and might as well be completely
wrong, both as a fact (indicating some paranoia on my side) and also
technically (indicating my ignorance about data mining etc. which is,
indeed, abunding).
uli
--
Uli Fahrenberg -- http://www.math.aau.dk/~uli
GETCO 2005 -- http://www.math.aau.dk/~uli/getco05/
--
htt
14 matches
Mail list logo