Re: gnome-mount and drive icon labels

2007-04-09 Thread dperkins
> This is probably dead now, but I was on vacation. > > On 4/5/07, Simon Geard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Wed, 2007-04-04 at 22:46 -0600, Dennis J Perkins wrote: >> > I'm not sure which program... gnome-mount, gnome-volume-manager, or >> > nautilus... is responsible for putting labels under d

Re: LFS/BLFS

2007-02-27 Thread dperkins
> On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 15:26 +0530, jignesh gangani wrote: >> Hi Barius, >>Could you give me policykit-2.0 required for HAL? >>I can't find it anywhere. If it is then it should be downloaded >> using git. But i haven't configured my net connection properly so git >> it not working.

Re: Anyone using gnome 2.16?

2007-01-19 Thread dperkins
> Hello, > > I was wondering if anyone is using gnome 2.16 as > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/ refers to 2.14. > > I was intending to try to build gnome 2.16 just following the above > instructions for 2.14 and hoping not to come across any snags. > > If anyone else has any tips the

Re: Why would a kernel upgrade change my X server resolution

2006-10-02 Thread dperkins
> On Sun, Oct 01, 2006 at 04:40:58PM -0600, Shawn wrote: > >> Section "Screen" >>Identifier "Screen0" >>Device "Card0" >>Monitor"Monitor0" >>SubSection "Display" >> Viewport 0 0 >> Modes "1280x1024" >>EndSubSection >> EndSection > > Doesn't help I'm afraid.

Re: Screen goes and stays black upon issuing `Xorg -configure`

2006-06-26 Thread dperkins
> My first question is whether this contradition could indicate that smth is > wrong with my build of Xorg? I don't think so. I have the same line in my /etc/ld.so.conf file. > When I execute `cd ~ && Xorg -configure` I get smth on the terminal, then > the screen goes and stays black. How can I

Re: Another day, another rebuild of gnome+evolution

2005-11-14 Thread dperkins
> Just a brief followup to my report a few weeks ago about how installing > evolution-2.4 caused my addressbook to disappear (and not provide any > means of entering new addresses) and calendar to lock up the > application. > > Since that time, I have downloaded gnome 2.12.1 and gnome 2.13.1, built

Re: dbus problem

2005-10-24 Thread dperkins
> On Sun, 2005-10-23 at 10:52 -0600, Dennis J Perkins wrote: >> I played around with dbus to try to figure out what is necessary. It >> looks like it is necessary to run /etc/rc.d/init.d/dbus before the eval >> command, or gnome-power-manager won't work, altho dbus-viewer didn't >> complain. >> >>

Re: cairo compile problem

2005-09-30 Thread dperkins
> Recently, Somebody Somewhere wrote these words >> On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 07:37 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> > I'll try ldconfig. >> > >> > There is a libpixman directory in cairo, so it looks like it is part >> > of cairo. BLFS doesn't say that cairo depends on libpixman, but now >> > that

Re: cairo compile problem

2005-09-29 Thread dperkins
> Dennis J Perkins wrote: >> I'm trying to compile cairo-1.0.0 and I get the following error. I >> don't see what is causing the error. >> >> make[3]: *** [libpixman_mmx_la-fbmmx.lo] Error 1 >> make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/misc/cairo-1.0.0/pixman/src' >> >> > > Can you tell me what that no

Re: cairo compile problem

2005-09-29 Thread dperkins
I'll try ldconfig. There is a libpixman directory in cairo, so it looks like it is part of cairo. BLFS doesn't say that cairo depends on libpixman, but now that you mention it, I vaguely remember that libpixman was an independent package. I'll try to post more data this evening. I didn't see an

Re: Evolution-2.0.2

2005-05-12 Thread dperkins
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >>>I think I've got my pkgconfig right, and built the right versions of the >>>dependencies, and yet Evolution's configure says this: >>> > > Found it, buried in all the spam I seem to be getting today. Hmm, > can't >> find gal-2.2. I can check my box this evening and

Re: Evolution-2.0.2

2005-05-12 Thread dperkins
> I think I've got my pkgconfig right, and built the right versions of the > dependencies, and yet Evolution's configure says this: > > checking for glib-2.0 libbonoboui-2.0 >= 2.4.2 gnome-vfs-2.0 > libgnomeui-2.0 libglade-2.0 libgnomecanvas-2.0 libxml-2.0 gconf-2.0 > gal-2.2 >= 2.2.3... Package ga

Re: Evolution-2.0.2

2005-05-12 Thread dperkins
> Richard A Downing FBCS CITP wrote these words on 05/12/05 12:00 CST: >> I think I've got my pkgconfig right, and built the right versions of the >> dependencies, and yet Evolution's configure says this: > I don't remember seeing your first post on this. I have built this package and might be ab

Re: Wireless card

2005-04-04 Thread dperkins
> Perkins, Dennis wrote: > >> I just installed a D-Link DWL-AG660 wireless card in my laptop. I >> compiled pcmcia-cs and madwifi to make it work. The only problem is >> that it does not automatically set up my connection. I can establish >> the network connection manually by doing this: >> >> Ifco

Re: fontconfig-2.3.1

2005-03-28 Thread dperkins
> Mark Carey wrote these words on 03/27/05 17:57 CST: > >> Following BLFS SVN trying to build fontconfig and I am getting an >> error regarding my open jade installation. Build host is lfs-svn >> 20050319. >> [snip] >> Any help appreciated. > > Some questions for you and Dennis. > > 1. Do you both

Re: Gnome 2.10?

2005-03-15 Thread dperkins
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> A few of the pre-existing ones no longer appear. I think Gnumeric was >> one. And the file cabinet icon is missing on the panel when I use the >> system variables, but present when the variables aren't set. >> >> Thanks for the firefox example. I will add that. >

Re: Gnome 2.10?

2005-03-15 Thread dperkins
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> I added these system variables to get the menus. There are a few icons >> that still aren't visible. I don't think I used --sysconfdir, however. >> I'll recompile and see if there is any difference. >> >> XDG_DATA_DIRS=$GARNOME/share >> XDG_CONFIG_DIRS=$GARNOME/et

Re: Gnome 2.10?

2005-03-15 Thread dperkins
> Simon Geard wrote: >> Hi all... anyone else playing with Gnome 2.10 yet? >> >> I've just finished building everything, but when it came to running the >> it, there are two unfortunate problems, possibly related: >> >> 1. The Applications menu is missing everything except the "Run >> Application"