On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 9:20 AM, wrote:
> On 02/13/12, Nathan Coulson wrote:
>
>
>> The reason it was disabled, was that we believed that one clock source
>> did a better job of keeping accurate time, then switching between 2
>> (system, and the hardware clock).
>> We actually use this code in BL
On 02/13/12, Nathan Coulson wrote:
> The reason it was disabled, was that we believed that one clock source
> did a better job of keeping accurate time, then switching between 2
> (system, and the hardware clock).
> We actually use this code in BLFS, under
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/v
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 5:42 PM, wrote:
> Alex: 4. How is the 'setclock' script run on "stop" (reboot,
> poweroff, etc.)?
> There used to be a 'K46setclock' in 'rc6.d' (i.e. level 6):
> "Setting hardware clock..."
> hwclock --systohc ...
>
>
Bruce:
Yes, I remember
al...@verizon.net wrote:
> 5. postmap
>
> I cannot find it (nor can the blfs Makefile - install-portmap)
It has been removed. Use rpcbind instead.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the
5. postmap
I cannot find it (nor can the blfs Makefile - install-portmap)
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On Sat, 04 Feb 2012 19:00:34 -0600
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> al...@verizon.net wrote:
> > 4. How is the 'setclock' script run on "stop" (reboot, poweroff, etc.)?
> >
> > There used to be a 'K46setclock' in 'rc6.d' (i.e. level 6):
> >
> > "Setting hardware clock..."
> > hwclock --systohc ...
>
> Y
Alex: 4. How is the 'setclock' script run on "stop" (reboot,
poweroff, etc.)?
There used to be a 'K46setclock' in 'rc6.d' (i.e. level 6):
"Setting hardware clock..."
hwclock --systohc ...
>>> Bruce:
>>> Yes, I remember that. It should have been in an old version of
>> Alex:>> 4. How is the 'setclock' script run on "stop" (reboot, poweroff,
>> etc.)?
>> There used to be a 'K46setclock' in 'rc6.d' (i.e. level 6):
>> "Setting hardware clock..."
>> hwclock --systohc ...
> Bruce:
> Yes, I remember that. It should have been in an old version of the LFS
> Makef
al...@verizon.net wrote:
> >> Alex:
> >> 4. How is the 'setclock' script run on "stop" (reboot, poweroff, etc.)?
> >> There used to be a 'K46setclock' in 'rc6.d' (i.e. level 6):
> >> "Setting hardware clock..."
> >> hwclock --systohc ...
>
> > Bruce:
> > Yes, I remember that. It should h
>> Alex:>> 4. How is the 'setclock' script run on "stop" (reboot, poweroff, etc.)?>> There used to be a 'K46setclock' in 'rc6.d' (i.e. level 6):>> "Setting hardware clock...">> hwclock --systohc ...> Bruce:> Yes, I remember that. It should have been in an old version of the LFS> Makefile for the
al...@verizon.net wrote:
> 4. How is the 'setclock' script run on "stop" (reboot, poweroff, etc.)?
>
> There used to be a 'K46setclock' in 'rc6.d' (i.e. level 6):
>
> "Setting hardware clock..."
> hwclock --systohc ...
Yes, I remember that. It should have been in an old version of the LFS
Ma
4. How is the 'setclock' script run on "stop" (reboot, poweroff, etc.)?
There used to be a 'K46setclock' in 'rc6.d' (i.e. level 6):
"Setting hardware clock..."
hwclock --systohc ...
What am I missing?
Thanks,
-- Alex
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://ww
al...@verizon.net wrote:
> On 02/03/12, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>>> Alex:
>>> there is an "improvement" that displays as a shorter, bunched-up list ...
>
>> I don't like that. I think it's very hard to read/find what you are
>> looking for. ...
>
> Hi Bruce,
>
> I gather the tantalizing riddle,
On 02/03/12, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Alex:
>> there is an "improvement" that displays as a shorter, bunched-up list ...
> I don't like that. I think it's very hard to read/find what you are
> looking for. ...
Hi Bruce,
I gather the tantalizing riddle,
"The grep can probably be improved upon."
al...@verizon.net wrote:
> This is a continuation of my OP.
>
> BTW, I'm finally talking Blfs here :)
>
> 3. The blfs 'Makefile'
>
> If the comment,
> "# The grep can probably be improved upon."
> refers to
>
> 3.1. 'grep' proper
> the 'grep' line looks good to me (for whatever that's worth :
This is a continuation of my OP.
BTW, I'm finally talking Blfs here :)
3. The blfs 'Makefile'
If the comment,
"# The grep can probably be improved upon."
refers to
3.1. 'grep' proper
the 'grep' line looks good to me (for whatever that's worth :).
3.2. If it refers to the output,
<<
install-s
al...@verizon.net wrote:
> It seems I'm embarrassingly behind (in general; here, script-wise),
> so please bear with me:
I think you wanted lfs-support, not blfs-support, but I'll answer here.
> 1. What happened with 'consolelog' script?
> ("dmesg -n $LOGLEVEL", ... "read level line < /proc/sys
First off, excellent release, thanks.
It seems I'm embarrassingly behind (in general; here, script-wise),
so please bear with me:
1. What happened with 'consolelog' script?
("dmesg -n $LOGLEVEL", ... "read level line < /proc/sys/kernel/printk")
It is still mentioned in the 9724 book,
<<
consol
18 matches
Mail list logo
