On 11/19/2011 06:59 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> For my client (seamonkey), the Reply-to: is visible. Return-Path: is
> not. Besides the return path is
> which is slightly confusing.
Yeah, you have to add it. Unfortunately, I've been using that and
carrying over for so long, I really don't rec
On Sat, 2011-11-19 at 16:53 -0600, DJ Lucas wrote:
> On 11/19/2011 02:51 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> > I'll take a look and see what I can do, but I've had filters for years
> > on the Reply-To: address. That is:
> >
> > BLFS Support List
> > LFS Support List
> >
> > etc.
> >
> > -- Bruce
>
> I'
--- Em sáb, 19/11/11, Bruce Dubbs escreveu:
> De: Bruce Dubbs
> Assunto: Re: [blfs-support] Request
> Para: "BLFS Support List"
> Data: Sábado, 19 de Novembro de 2011, 18:51
> Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
...
> > I am having a little trouble with the messages
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> I do not know to which list should I address this.
>
> I am having a little trouble with the messages, now that I am trying
> to follow more than one *lfs* list. Worse, when the same message is a
> notification simultaneously sent to more than one list.
>
> I would l
I do not know to which list should I address this.
I am having a little trouble with the messages, now that I am trying to follow
more than one *lfs* list. Worse, when the same message is a notification
simultaneously sent to more than one list.
I would like to suggest, to the maintainers (Bruc
