Re: [blfs-support] World's worst seder

2012-06-23 Thread Bruce Dubbs
On Jun 23, 2012 10:28 AM, "DJ Lucas" wrote: > > On 06/23/2012 11:59 AM, DJ Lucas wrote: > > On 06/23/2012 11:27 AM, DJ Lucas wrote: > > > > Never mind...had to escape the braces. Ultimately, the substitution I > > was looking for was this: > > > > '/^[a-z0-9]\{32\} [a-z]/s@^[a-z0-9]\{32\}@\&-md5s

Re: [blfs-support] World's worst seder

2012-06-23 Thread DJ Lucas
On 06/23/2012 11:59 AM, DJ Lucas wrote: > On 06/23/2012 11:27 AM, DJ Lucas wrote: >> what is the correct syntax >> for [a-z0-9]{32}? >> >> -- DJ Lucas >> > > Never mind...had to escape the braces. Ultimately, the substitution I > was looking for was this: > > '/^[a-z0-9]\{32\} [a-z]/s@^[a-z0-9]\{3

Re: [blfs-support] World's worst seder

2012-06-23 Thread DJ Lucas
On 06/23/2012 11:27 AM, DJ Lucas wrote: > what is the correct syntax > for [a-z0-9]{32}? > > -- DJ Lucas > Never mind...had to escape the braces. Ultimately, the substitution I was looking for was this: '/^[a-z0-9]\{32\} [a-z]/s@^[a-z0-9]\{32\}@\&-md5sum;@' -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mai

[blfs-support] World's worst seder

2012-06-23 Thread DJ Lucas
Well I thought I was well versed, but I needed to import the xorg md5sums into the book. After futzing with it for a few minutes, instead of asking for help on this pattern: /^[a-z0-9]{32} [a-z]/ I got ticked off and used a ridiculously long command with 32 dots (twice) just to get it done. :