Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
>> On Fri, May 04, 2012 at 11:14:19AM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>> Ken Moffat wrote:
>>>
Actually, 10 bootable partitions on a dos disk is pushing it - I
suppose one or more of /boot, /home, swap is in a primary partition.
>>> Why?
>>>
>>> As of
Ken Moffat wrote:
> Actually, 10 bootable partitions on a dos disk is pushing it - I
> suppose one or more of /boot, /home, swap is in a primary partition.
Why?
As of Jan 20, 2010
Disk /dev/sda: 320.1 GB, 320072933376 bytes
255 heads, 63 sectors/track, 38913 cylinders
Units = cylinders of 160
On Thu, May 03, 2012 at 10:52:18PM -0400, Walter Webb wrote:
> My kernel has:
>
> # CONFIG_FIRMWARE_IN_KERNEL is not set
> CONFIG_EXTRA_FIRMWARE=""
>
> and I have no clue where it comes from.
>
in menuconfig,
Device Drivers
Generic Driver Options (the first item)
there is an option 'Preve
On Fri, 04 May 2012 03:55:25 +0100
Walter Webb wrote:
> My kernel has:
>
> # CONFIG_FIRMWARE_IN_KERNEL is not set
> CONFIG_EXTRA_FIRMWARE=""
>
> and I have no clue where it comes from.
In make menuconfig:
Device Drivers --->
Generic Driver Options --->
-*- Userspace firmware loading su
Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Wed, 02 May 2012 22:34:01 +0100
> Walter Webb wrote:
>
>> Well, I tried KMS on both computers. Both hesitated for a long time
>> when booting, after which the older one with a Radeon HD 3600 Series
>> made the display unusable; lots of colors in a fine-grained display.
>>
On Wed, 02 May 2012 22:34:01 +0100
Walter Webb wrote:
> Well, I tried KMS on both computers. Both hesitated for a long time
> when booting, after which the older one with a Radeon HD 3600 Series
> made the display unusable; lots of colors in a fine-grained display.
> The newer one with a Radeon H
On Wed, May 02, 2012 at 05:33:22PM -0400, Walter Webb wrote:
> Well, I tried KMS on both computers. Both hesitated for a long time
> when booting, after which the older one with a Radeon HD 3600 Series
> made the display unusable; lots of colors in a fine-grained display.
> The newer one with a Rad
DJ Lucas wrote:
> On 05/01/2012 11:51 PM, Walter Webb wrote:
>
>> The first problem I encountered was that there was
>> no acceleration in the X server with LFS-7.1. The problem appears
>> to be with something installed before X. I am still working on
>> that.
> What video card? If newer ATI, Int
On 05/01/2012 11:51 PM, Walter Webb wrote:
> The first problem I encountered was that there was
> no acceleration in the X server with LFS-7.1. The problem appears
> to be with something installed before X. I am still working on
> that.
What video card? If newer ATI, Intel, or NVidia device, yo
Sorry,I forgot to include the message.
I have not used my (somewhat) older computer much since I got my
newer one. During my recent network problems, I decided to upgrade
from LFS-6.3. The first problem I encountered was that there was
no acceleration in the X server with LFS-7.1. The problem a
10 matches
Mail list logo