On 01/10/2013 02:00 PM, lux-integ wrote:
> Greetings
>
> I dont know if I am uninformed but I get the impression that cyrus-sasl is not
> being developed anymore. I noticed there is a gnusasl (gsasl) which seems to
> be actively developed. This springs a few questions:-
>
> q1: Does anyone know
On 1/10/2013 7:00 AM, lux-integ wrote:
> I dont know if I am uninformed but I get the impression that cyrus-sasl is not
> being developed anymore.
What makes you think that? The Cyrus-SASL mailing lists are active and
have big name guys (Howard Chu, Henry Hotz) contributing patches, etc. to
the Cy
Greetings
I dont know if I am uninformed but I get the impression that cyrus-sasl is not
being developed anymore. I noticed there is a gnusasl (gsasl) which seems to
be actively developed. This springs a few questions:-
q1: Does anyone know if gsasl is a direct replacement for cyrus-sasl?
q
