--- Em qua, 30/1/13, Ken Moffat escreveu:
> De: Ken Moffat
> Assunto: Re: [blfs-support] firefox-18.0.1 : system jpeg considered harmful
> Para: "BLFS Support List"
> Data: Quarta-feira, 30 de Janeiro de 2013, 7:49
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 02:09:20AM
> -0800
--- Em qua, 30/1/13, Ken Moffat escreveu:
> De: Ken Moffat
> Assunto: Re: [blfs-support] firefox-18.0.1 : system jpeg considered harmful
> Para: "BLFS Support List"
> Data: Quarta-feira, 30 de Janeiro de 2013, 7:40
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 02:15:55AM
> -0800, Fernand
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 02:09:20AM -0800, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>
> If you do not mind, you might try to see that moving out lib version
> 8.4.0 will not break anything, just un case keep it elsewhere. After
> more people checking it, a recommendation either for changing the link
> or rem
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 02:15:55AM -0800, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> The link must have worked. Just changed to root again, so number
> changed, and got:
>
> # history | grep libjpeg
> ...
> 1799 mv -vi /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.8 /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.8-installed
> 1800 ln -sv libjpeg.so.8.0.2 /u
The link must have worked. Just changed to root again, so number
changed, and got:
# history | grep libjpeg
...
1799 mv -vi /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.8 /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.8-installed
1800 ln -sv libjpeg.so.8.0.2 /usr/lib/libjpeg.so.8
...
[]s,
Fernando
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listi
--- Em ter, 29/1/13, Ken Moffat escreveu:
> De: Ken Moffat
> Assunto: Re: [blfs-support] firefox-18.0.1 : system jpeg considered harmful
> Para: "BLFS Support List"
> Data: Terça-feira, 29 de Janeiro de 2013, 18:00
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 07:07:13PM
> +, Ken Moff
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 07:07:13PM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 09:03:18AM -0800, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> >
> > Hi, ĸen
> >
Missed that part - thanks :)
> Intereesting. I have
> $ls -l /usr/lib/libjpeg.so*
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Jan 29 12:02 /usr/lib/libjpe
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 02:23:31PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> AFAIK, the main capabilities that libtool provide is the ability to
> cross build from one architecture to another.
>
I think its main purpose is to provide usable libraries whatever
the *platform* (related to all those tests in c
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> About the .a and .la. This is another thing I need to understand. Many
> discussions, here.
.a files have it's contained functions embedded in the executable. It
is only used in the link phase of the build process. If used, the
executable does not look for the fu
Below, some corrections to what I wrote previously.
--- Em ter, 29/1/13, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu:
> De: Fernando de Oliveira
> Assunto: Re: [blfs-support] firefox-18.0.1 : system jpeg considered harmful
> Para: "BLFS Support List"
> Data: Terça-feira, 29 de Janeiro d
--- Em ter, 29/1/13, Bruce Dubbs escreveu:
> De: Bruce Dubbs
> Assunto: Re: [blfs-support] firefox-18.0.1 : system jpeg considered harmful
> Para: "BLFS Support List"
> Data: Terça-feira, 29 de Janeiro de 2013, 16:43
> Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>
> > Just rem
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> Just remembered: after many *jepg* install/remove and at the same time
> (better say at the same problem), I had two versions of
> xulrunner/firefox-18.0.1, one with system jpeg, other with built-in
> jpeg. So, the same version did not work for one combination and lat
Sorry for last post. At the end of that, you will find the following:
> I did not
> undertood why just redoing the symlink did not work.
s/did not undertood/did not undertand/
Just remembered: after many *jepg* install/remove and at the same time
(better say at the same problem), I had two ver
[]s,
Fernando
--- Em ter, 29/1/13, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu:
> De: Fernando de Oliveira
> Assunto: Re: [blfs-support] firefox-18.0.1 : system jpeg considered harmful
> Para: "BLFS Support List"
> Data: Terça-feira, 29 de Janeiro de 2013, 16:20
> --- Em
--- Em ter, 29/1/13, Bruce Dubbs escreveu:
> De: Bruce Dubbs
> Assunto: Re: [blfs-support] firefox-18.0.1 : system jpeg considered harmful
> Para: "BLFS Support List"
> Data: Terça-feira, 29 de Janeiro de 2013, 16:14
> Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> > Found the
--- Em ter, 29/1/13, Ken Moffat escreveu:
> De: Ken Moffat
> Assunto: Re: [blfs-support] firefox-18.0.1 : system jpeg considered harmful
> Para: "BLFS Support List"
> Data: Terça-feira, 29 de Janeiro de 2013, 16:07
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 09:03:18AM
> -0800
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> Found the file.
>
> I had (after many installs, without remove):
>
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 448148 Jan 21 12:47 /usr/lib/libjpeg.a
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root784 Jan 21 12:47 /usr/lib/libjpeg.la
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Jan 21 12:47 /usr/lib/libjpeg.so ->
> li
--- Em ter, 29/1/13, Ken Moffat escreveu:
> De: Ken Moffat
> Assunto: Re: [blfs-support] firefox-18.0.1 : system jpeg considered harmful
> Para: "BLFS Support List"
> Data: Terça-feira, 29 de Janeiro de 2013, 15:50
> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 05:43:32PM
> +0100, Armin K
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 09:03:18AM -0800, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>
> Hi, ĸen
>
> [I am reading the log of the strip everything just finished, so, do not
> have all I need to answer, but perhaps I have enough.]
>
> Yes, I solved it. Took me a while. Everything worked after I completely
> r
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 05:43:32PM +0100, Armin K. wrote:
>
> Odd. I did notice that sometimes jpeg image loading is a bit slow -
LOL - turbo for slow
> white rectangles here. But they seem to load when you scroll a bit down
> through them. Youtube works fine here, no problems. I don't know w
Found the file.
I had (after many installs, without remove):
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 448148 Jan 21 12:47 /usr/lib/libjpeg.a
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root784 Jan 21 12:47 /usr/lib/libjpeg.la
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 16 Jan 21 12:47 /usr/lib/libjpeg.so ->
libjpeg.so.8.0.2
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root
--- Em ter, 29/1/13, Ken Moffat escreveu:
> De: Ken Moffat
> Assunto: [blfs-support] firefox-18.0.1 : system jpeg considered harmful
> Para:
> Data: Terça-feira, 29 de Janeiro de 2013, 12:57
> I've upgraded to firefox-18.0.1 on
> one machine (x86_64, radeon r600
> vide
On 01/29/2013 04:57 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> I've upgraded to firefox-18.0.1 on one machine (x86_64, radeon r600
> video chipset), after building nasm and turbo jpeg. Everything was
> fine, apart from an absence of jpegs. Some pages seemed to render
> ok, others had either white or grey areas wh
I've upgraded to firefox-18.0.1 on one machine (x86_64, radeon r600
video chipset), after building nasm and turbo jpeg. Everything was
fine, apart from an absence of jpegs. Some pages seemed to render
ok, others had either white or grey areas where an image should be,
e.g. news.google.co.uk had
24 matches
Mail list logo
