On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 10:07 AM, lux-integ wrote:
> On Saturday 05 October 2013 16:46:52 Aleksandar Kuktin wrote:
> I'm re-sending the link you submitted:
> http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/www-client/chromi
> um/chromium-30.0.1599.66.ebuild?view=markup
> thanks very much
On Saturday 05 October 2013 16:46:52 Aleksandar Kuktin wrote:
> I'm re-sending the link you submitted:
> http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/www-client/chromi
> um/chromium-30.0.1599.66.ebuild?view=markup
thanks very much for the sending the link
( I sincerely hope other blfs
Hi Aleksandar:
> Oh! I'm sorry. Terribly sorry. ...
Absolutely no need to, whatsoever.
It so happens that Gmail has become too fat for it's own good lately (IMHO)
so I wouldn't be surprised if people were avoiding it.
In a kind of a wild guess I assumed integ had not used Gmail to transmit
that
>On Sat, 5 Oct 2013 13:11:05 -0400
>alex lupu wrote:
> I told integ that in my experience with Gmail, my links, no matter
> how long, seem to always arrive at the destination in one piece,
> ready for the addressee to use.
> As further proof I re-sent him his original address using Gmail, _and_
>
Hi Alexandar, Bruce:
> Alexandar:
Is that because of the web interface?
You can also use Gmail with a mail program and use Google's servers
merely as relays. That's what I have been doing for ... lemme just
check the mail archive... 4 years. Give or take.
For this, you can use either IMAP or POP
Aleksandar Kuktin wrote:
>> On Sat, 5 Oct 2013 11:00:18 -0400
>> alex lupu wrote:
>>
>> Hi integ,
>>
>>> the bottom half ...
>>> < broken link to be copied and pasted>
>>
>> I'm re-sending the link you submitted:
>>
>> http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/www-client/chromium/chr
>On Sat, 5 Oct 2013 11:00:18 -0400
>alex lupu wrote:
>
> Hi integ,
>
> > the bottom half ...
> > < broken link to be copied and pasted>
>
> I'm re-sending the link you submitted:
>
> http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/www-client/chromium/chromium-30.0.1599.66.ebuild?view=ma
Hi integ,
> the bottom half ...
> < broken link to be copied and pasted>
I'm re-sending the link you submitted:
http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/www-client/chromium/chromium-30.0.1599.66.ebuild?view=markup
_If_ it arrives in one piece at a destination, maybe for long link
On Friday 04 October 2013 19:05:58 alex lupu wrote:
> Hi Bruce:
> > I changed the 404 page to provide links to gmane.
>
> I apologize for the previous top post.
> Them google guys with their #$%^&*!~ Gmail did it to me agian!
>
the bottom half of this looks interesting
http://sources.gentoo.org/c
Hi Bruce:
> I changed the 404 page to provide links to gmane.
I apologize for the previous top post.
Them google guys with their #$%^&*!~ Gmail did it to me agian!
Thanks,
-- Alex
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Uns
alex lupu wrote:
> Hi Bruce:
>
>>> PSs 1. Sorry for sending you to a foreign site. Our BLFS Archive is
>>> temporarily unavailable. Could be them guys at Google again?
>
>> It's not temporary. Some places download everything regardless of
>> robots.txt. It a cost of bandwidth issue.
>
> 10-4
Hi Bruce:
>> PSs 1. Sorry for sending you to a foreign site. Our BLFS Archive is
>> temporarily unavailable. Could be them guys at Google again?
> It's not temporary. Some places download everything regardless of
> robots.txt. It a cost of bandwidth issue.
10-4
Humble suggestion.
Instead
alex lupu wrote:
> Hi Integ,
>
> You're out of luck.
> A lot of things have changed in this decade.
> Google even changed their browser name from "chrome" to "chrome"(!) :)
> For perfect elucidation of the above, read thread:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lfs.beyond.support/47303
>
> On t
Hi Integ,
You're out of luck.
A lot of things have changed in this decade.
Google even changed their browser name from "chrome" to "chrome"(!) :)
For perfect elucidation of the above, read thread:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.lfs.beyond.support/47303
On top of all that, it's been close so
Greetings,
I would like to know if any blfs'ers have dabbled recently with building
google chrome, webrtc et al and is able o share their experience.
I last did chrome successfully in 2010 but the build system has changed
consuderably..
--1---It now uses a poorly documented 'thingy' calle
15 matches
Mail list logo