Re: [blfs-support] help required with gobject-introspection

2013-06-29 Thread Wayne Blaszczyk
On 29/06/13 23:19, Armin K. wrote: > On 06/29/2013 03:12 PM, Armin K. wrote: >> On 06/29/2013 05:38 AM, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: >>> On 13/06/13 01:36, Armin K. wrote: > > Also, forgot to add that I used the temp. instructions with GCC 4.7.2 > ... I don't know what has changed with GCC 4.8 n

Re: [blfs-support] help required with gobject-introspection

2013-06-29 Thread Armin K.
On 06/29/2013 03:12 PM, Armin K. wrote: > On 06/29/2013 05:38 AM, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: >> On 13/06/13 01:36, Armin K. wrote: >>> >>> I see nothing wrong there. It can be that your ldd is part of 32bit >>> glibc (was it you that was building multilib CLFS?) and it can't check >>> 64bit libr

Re: [blfs-support] help required with gobject-introspection

2013-06-29 Thread Armin K.
On 06/29/2013 05:38 AM, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: > On 13/06/13 01:36, Armin K. wrote: >>> >> >> I see nothing wrong there. It can be that your ldd is part of 32bit >> glibc (was it you that was building multilib CLFS?) and it can't check >> 64bit libraries. My practice for multilib LFS (yes LFS) is

Re: [blfs-support] help required with gobject-introspection

2013-06-28 Thread Wayne Blaszczyk
On 13/06/13 01:36, Armin K. wrote: >> > > I see nothing wrong there. It can be that your ldd is part of 32bit > glibc (was it you that was building multilib CLFS?) and it can't check > 64bit libraries. My practice for multilib LFS (yes LFS) is only to > install 32bit libraries into /lib32 and/o

Re: [blfs-support] help required with gobject-introspection

2013-06-12 Thread lux-integ
On Wednesday 12 June 2013 16:36:36 Armin K. wrote: > On 06/12/2013 05:34 PM, lux-integ wrote: > > On Wednesday 12 June 2013 16:00:15 Armin K. wrote: > >> If you run "file /usr/lib/libg{object,lib}-2.0.so*", what does it say? > >> (Don't forget the asterisk) > > > > /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so:

Re: [blfs-support] help required with gobject-introspection

2013-06-12 Thread Armin K.
On 06/12/2013 05:34 PM, lux-integ wrote: > On Wednesday 12 June 2013 16:00:15 Armin K. wrote: >> If you run "file /usr/lib/libg{object,lib}-2.0.so*", what does it say? >> (Don't forget the asterisk) > /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so: symbolic link to > `libgobject-2.0.so.0.3600.2' > /usr/lib/li

Re: [blfs-support] help required with gobject-introspection

2013-06-12 Thread lux-integ
On Wednesday 12 June 2013 16:00:15 Armin K. wrote: > If you run "file /usr/lib/libg{object,lib}-2.0.so*", what does it say? > (Don't forget the asterisk) /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so: symbolic link to `libgobject-2.0.so.0.3600.2' /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0:symbolic link to `lib

Re: [blfs-support] help required with gobject-introspection

2013-06-12 Thread Armin K.
On 06/12/2013 04:51 PM, lux-integ wrote: > On Wednesday 12 June 2013 15:42:01 lux-integ wrote: >> On Wednesday 12 June 2013 14:12:04 Armin K. wrote: >>> Don't use g-i 1.37. It's unstable. Use 1.36.0. Also, what does ldd >>> /usr/lib/libg{object,lib}-2.0.so say? >> >> both return >> 'not a dynamic e

Re: [blfs-support] help required with gobject-introspection

2013-06-12 Thread lux-integ
On Wednesday 12 June 2013 15:42:01 lux-integ wrote: > On Wednesday 12 June 2013 14:12:04 Armin K. wrote: > > Don't use g-i 1.37. It's unstable. Use 1.36.0. Also, what does ldd > > /usr/lib/libg{object,lib}-2.0.so say? > > both return > 'not a dynamic executible' in fact though I am root ldd is

Re: [blfs-support] help required with gobject-introspection

2013-06-12 Thread lux-integ
On Wednesday 12 June 2013 14:12:04 Armin K. wrote: > Don't use g-i 1.37. It's unstable. Use 1.36.0. Also, what does ldd > /usr/lib/libg{object,lib}-2.0.so say? both return 'not a dynamic executible' -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.or

Re: [blfs-support] help required with gobject-introspection

2013-06-12 Thread Armin K.
On 06/12/2013 02:38 PM, lux-integ wrote: > On Wednesday 12 June 2013 13:24:52 lux-integ wrote: >> On Wednesday 12 June 2013 11:36:10 Armin K. wrote: >>> Run make with V=1 as an argument and post the output. >> >> I sent the whole of make V=1 for gobject inrospection-1.37.1 but the >> moderator see

Re: [blfs-support] help required with gobject-introspection

2013-06-12 Thread lux-integ
On Wednesday 12 June 2013 13:24:52 lux-integ wrote: > On Wednesday 12 June 2013 11:36:10 Armin K. wrote: > > Run make with V=1 as an argument and post the output. > > I sent the whole of make V=1 for gobject inrospection-1.37.1 but the > moderator seems nonplussed as the message appears too long

Re: [blfs-support] help required with gobject-introspection

2013-06-12 Thread lux-integ
On Wednesday 12 June 2013 11:36:10 Armin K. wrote: > Run make with V=1 as an argument and post the output. > I sent the whole of make V=1 for gobject inrospection-1.37.1 but the moderator seems nonplussed as the message appears too long and awaiits 'moderator aproval' so whilst the moderato

Re: [blfs-support] help required with gobject-introspection

2013-06-12 Thread Armin K.
On 06/12/2013 12:30 PM, lux-integ wrote: > I tried compiling recent gobject introspection releases. The computer has > these:- > --cpu AMD64 -2 cores > --gcc-4.8.1, glibc-2.17, > I tried 2 versions of glib ( > glib-2.36.1, > glib-2.36.2 ) > (which builds ) > > and 3 versions of gobject introspecti

[blfs-support] help required with gobject-introspection

2013-06-12 Thread lux-integ
I tried compiling recent gobject introspection releases. The computer has these:- --cpu AMD64 -2 cores --gcc-4.8.1, glibc-2.17, I tried 2 versions of glib ( glib-2.36.1, glib-2.36.2 ) (which builds ) and 3 versions of gobject introspection ( gobject-introspection-1.35.9, gobject-introspectio