rhubarbpie...@gmail.com wrote:
> On 03/13/13 11:00, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> rhubarbpie...@gmail.com wrote:
>>> I was quite impressed at how quickly a sed fix for jfsutils was given;
>>> it worked quite well. I also see the documentation already reflects the
>>> fix and ./configure change. But shoul
On 03/13/13 11:00, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> rhubarbpie...@gmail.com wrote:
>> I was quite impressed at how quickly a sed fix for jfsutils was given;
>> it worked quite well. I also see the documentation already reflects the
>> fix and ./configure change. But should "This package is known to build
>>
rhubarbpie...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> I was quite impressed at how quickly a sed fix for jfsutils was given;
> it worked quite well. I also see the documentation already reflects the
> fix and ./configure change. But should "This package is known to build
> using an LFS 7.2 platform but has not been
I was quite impressed at how quickly a sed fix for jfsutils was given;
it worked quite well. I also see the documentation already reflects the
fix and ./configure change. But should "This package is known to build
using an LFS 7.2 platform but has not been tested." be changed to
reference th
