Re: [blfs-support] linuxPAM-1.1.6 on 64-bit setups

2013-06-15 Thread lux-integ
On Friday 14 June 2013 16:05:26 William Harrington wrote: > Did you use CLFS for your build and pure 64 bit? If that's the case > then you have no lib64 and CBLFS installs shadow and yes you need -- > libdir=/lib I actually tried both (which both worked for shadow ) i.e. /lib and /usr/lib; i

Re: [blfs-support] linuxPAM-1.1.6 on 64-bit setups

2013-06-14 Thread William Harrington
On Jun 14, 2013, at 9:03 AM, lux-integ wrote: if one installs LinuxPAM-1.1.6 on an pure64-bit (non-multilib) setup using the blfs instructions Did you use CLFS for your build and pure 64 bit? If that's the case then you have no lib64 and CBLFS installs shadow and yes you need -- libdir=/

Re: [blfs-support] linuxPAM-1.1.6 on 64-bit setups

2013-06-14 Thread Armin K.
On 06/14/2013 04:03 PM, lux-integ wrote: > > if one installs LinuxPAM-1.1.6 on an pure64-bit (non-multilib) setup using the > blfs instructions > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/postlfs/linux-pam.html > (i.e. no --libdir specified ) it puts the libraries in /lib64 and then shadow > c

[blfs-support] linuxPAM-1.1.6 on 64-bit setups

2013-06-14 Thread lux-integ
if one installs LinuxPAM-1.1.6 on an pure64-bit (non-multilib) setup using the blfs instructions http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/postlfs/linux-pam.html (i.e. no --libdir specified ) it puts the libraries in /lib64 and then shadow cant find the pam-libraries to compile linuxPAM,