;> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 19:19:46 +0100
> >>> From: Sven Bartscher
> >>> To: BLFS Support List
> >>> Subject: [blfs-support] moving lfs
> >>>
> >>> i want to move my lfs-system on a logical partition because i have
> >>&
Pretty simple, I have been successfully copy a whole LFS system to another
media without no problem. What you want to have is just another Linux
distro running to make sure that the dev, proc, sys, and run folder to be
populated.
>From there, just tar it all and untar it anywhere else.
This method
On 3/20/2013 3:04 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Armin K. wrote:
>>
>>> I am for tar approach, but in that case no need
>>> for "dd" ... If you use "dd" you'll get a copy of your partition which
>>> will be the same size as your partition - not cool if you want to resize
>>> it. Jus
On 3/20/2013 7:24 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Baho Utot wrote:
>> On 03/20/2013 03:04 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>
>> [putolin]
>>
>>> Let me also add that if you have a new disk, partition it using gdisk
>>> to get a GPT Partition table. No more extended/logical partitions!
>>> Only 128 primary partitio
Baho Utot wrote:
> On 03/20/2013 03:04 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> [putolin]
>
>> Let me also add that if you have a new disk, partition it using gdisk
>> to get a GPT Partition table. No more extended/logical partitions!
>> Only 128 primary partitions. It also keeps partitions on 1MiB
>> boundaries
On 03/20/2013 03:04 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
[putolin]
> Let me also add that if you have a new disk, partition it using gdisk
> to get a GPT Partition table. No more extended/logical partitions!
> Only 128 primary partitions. It also keeps partitions on 1MiB
> boundaries which I find useful. --
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 09:46:51PM +0100, Armin K. wrote:
>
> Yes, I remember the issue when /dev/console and /dev/null nodes were
> missing after backup with Debian 6 version of "tar" ... Sockets aren't
> added either, but it prints a warning. I think though that device nodes
> issue is fixed
On 03/20/2013 09:51 PM, akhiezer wrote:
>> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:33:48 -0500
>> From: Bruce Dubbs
>> To: akhiezer ,
>> BLFS Support List
>> Subject: Re: [blfs-support] moving lfs
>>
>> akhiezer wrote:
>>
>>>- sockets,
> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 15:33:48 -0500
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> To: akhiezer ,
> BLFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [blfs-support] moving lfs
>
> akhiezer wrote:
>
> > - sockets, devs, doors, the usual stuff: I interpreted the original
> > problem
>
akhiezer wrote:
> - sockets, devs, doors, the usual stuff: I interpreted the original problem
> sub-item spec as getting a byte-for-byte copy of the lfs partition(s) as-is,
> and then restoring them. If instead it's loosened to not bothering about some
> items/aspects and allowing/assuming their
> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:28:37 -0500
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> To: akhiezer ,
> BLFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [blfs-support] moving lfs
>
> akhiezer wrote:
>
> > The reason I didn't mention tar is that on various systems and versions, it
> > ca
akhiezer wrote:
> The reason I didn't mention tar is that on various systems and versions, it
> can (at least historically) be a bit fiddly to preserve some
> permissions/ownerships/timestamps - depends on how much you're bothered about
> that - and sometimes chokes on 'special' files: hence the u
> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 19:44:10 +0100
> From: "Armin K."
> To: BLFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [blfs-support] moving lfs
>
.
.
>
> Please don't top post. I am for tar approach, but in that case no need
> for "dd" ... If you u
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Armin K. wrote:
>
>> I am for tar approach, but in that case no need
>> for "dd" ... If you use "dd" you'll get a copy of your partition which
>> will be the same size as your partition - not cool if you want to resize
>> it. Just extract the tarball on the new partition - work
Armin K. wrote:
> I am for tar approach, but in that case no need
> for "dd" ... If you use "dd" you'll get a copy of your partition which
> will be the same size as your partition - not cool if you want to resize
> it. Just extract the tarball on the new partition - worked for me always.
Yes, yo
> Nicholas McCurdy-Luksch
> mindwarpstud...@aim.com
>
> lf...@cruziero.com wrote:
>
>>> From blfs-support-boun...@linuxfromscratch.org Wed Mar 20 18:26:50 2013
>>> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 19:19:46 +0100
>>> From: Sven Bartscher
>>> To: BLFS Suppo
; From blfs-support-boun...@linuxfromscratch.org Wed Mar 20 18:26:50 2013
>> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 19:19:46 +0100
>> From: Sven Bartscher
>> To: BLFS Support List
>> Subject: [blfs-support] moving lfs
>>
>> i want to move my lfs-system on a logical partition bec
> From blfs-support-boun...@linuxfromscratch.org Wed Mar 20 18:26:50 2013
> Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 19:19:46 +0100
> From: Sven Bartscher
> To: BLFS Support List
> Subject: [blfs-support] moving lfs
>
> i want to move my lfs-system on a logical partition because i have
&
i want to move my lfs-system on a logical partition because i have
already four primary partitions on my drive and can't create any new but
want a few more. So to do that i would:
copy (with rsync) all the files from the lfs partition on another
temporary partition (on another drive)
delete the
19 matches
Mail list logo
