On 6/13/06, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Where are you considering adding the note? To the "About system users
and groups" section in Chapter 3?
Yeah.
If so, then I think a message can't hurt. However, Bruce wrote that
page, so you should probably defer to his judgment.
Agreed
Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 06/13/06 13:29 CST:
> If the other BLFS editors agree, I'll add a note saying that creating
> a new user will default to group 100, so you should create that. And
> maybe I'll say something about putting all your users in a common
> group. That should be intuit
On 6/13/06, Craig Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is this something that has
come up for in a discussion? I don't mean to start a flame war
between the BLFS and LFS teams :) It seems like part of a basic setup
to have a "users" group with an ID of 100. If the LFS team does not
agree, it co
