On 3/6/07, Simon Geard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 17:45 -0700, Shawn wrote:
> > Sorry Brian, I did not read your post closely enough. I think you have
> > no choice but to run such a script as root. However, maybe you could
> > build all the packages (as user) then, when th
On 3/3/07, TheOldFellow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dan Nicholson wrote:
>
> > There is asciidoc. I don't know if it's powerful enough for our needs,
> > but interesting. The kernel and git documentation is processed by
> > asciidoc.
> >
> > http://www.methods.co.nz/asciidoc/
>
> Thanks Dan, My ra
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> There is asciidoc. I don't know if it's powerful enough for our needs,
> but interesting. The kernel and git documentation is processed by
> asciidoc.
>
> http://www.methods.co.nz/asciidoc/
Thanks Dan, My rant was worth the effort! A new discovery. Off to play
with a new
On 3/3/07, TheOldFellow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I dislike writing in XML. Computers should do things my way, for my
> convenience. Writing the book in XML is, IMO, difficult and error
> prone. It should be written with something that outputs the XML, but
> edits in English. Wiki mark-up
Matthew Burgess wrote:
> On Friday 02 March 2007 11:49, TheOldFellow wrote:
>
>> The only difficulty with JHALFS is if you want to build ALMOST what's in
>> the book. Like, for instance, I don't want the old sysvinit or Berk's
>> DB or Man-db or Syslog, but all the rest please. Now JHALFS isn't
On Thu, 01 Mar 2007 23:21:36 -, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On 3/1/07, Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Please could someone spell out the reason for building software as an
>> unprivileged user? This is recommended in the BLFS book and else
On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 08:21:43 -, Alan Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Brian wrote:
>> Please could someone spell out the reason for building software as an
>> unprivileged user? This is recommended in the BLFS book and elsewhere
>> (though not in LFS), but I ca
On Fri, 02 Mar 2007 00:45:20 -, Shawn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On March 1, 2007, Brian wrote:
>> Please could someone spell out the reason for building software as an
>> unprivileged user? This is recommended in the BLFS book and elsewhere
>> (though not in LF
On Friday 02 March 2007 11:49, TheOldFellow wrote:
> The only difficulty with JHALFS is if you want to build ALMOST what's in
> the book. Like, for instance, I don't want the old sysvinit or Berk's
> DB or Man-db or Syslog, but all the rest please. Now JHALFS isn't so good.
I'd probably handle
On 3/1/07, Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please could someone spell out the reason for building software as an
unprivileged user? This is recommended in the BLFS book and elsewhere
(though not in LFS), but I can't find a full explanation.
If running 'make' as roo
Brian wrote:
> Please could someone spell out the reason for building software as an
> unprivileged user? This is recommended in the BLFS book and elsewhere
> (though not in LFS), but I can't find a full explanation.
> (The reason I'm asking, in case you're interes
Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 3/1/07, Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Please could someone spell out the reason for building software as an
>> unprivileged user? This is recommended in the BLFS book and elsewhere
> You pretty much hit the nail on the head. In LFS, we don&
On March 1, 2007, Brian wrote:
> Please could someone spell out the reason for building software as an
> unprivileged user? This is recommended in the BLFS book and elsewhere
> (though not in LFS), but I can't find a full explanation.
>
> If running 'make' as root co
On 3/1/07, Brian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please could someone spell out the reason for building software as an
> unprivileged user? This is recommended in the BLFS book and elsewhere
> (though not in LFS), but I can't find a full explanation.
>
> If running 'ma
On March 1, 2007, Brian wrote:
> Please could someone spell out the reason for building software as an
> unprivileged user? This is recommended in the BLFS book and elsewhere
> (though not in LFS), but I can't find a full explanation.
>
> If running 'make' as root co
15 matches
Mail list logo
