Re: Nvidia driver

2008-04-01 Thread J. Greenlees
Alberto Hernando wrote: > El Lunes, 31 de Marzo de 2008 20:41, Nicolas FRANCOIS escribió: > >> I installed the last SVN version of LFS, everything working fine. I then >> installed the base of BLFS upto X, still fine. >> >> But when I tried to install the last Nvidia kernel, I had this problem >

Re: Nvidia driver

2008-04-01 Thread Alberto Hernando
El Lunes, 31 de Marzo de 2008 20:41, Nicolas FRANCOIS escribió: > I installed the last SVN version of LFS, everything working fine. I then > installed the base of BLFS upto X, still fine. > > But when I tried to install the last Nvidia kernel, I had this problem > while launching X : > > NVIDIA: co

Re: Nvidia driver (solved, I think)

2008-03-31 Thread Nicolas FRANCOIS
Le Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:12:05 +0200 Theo Schneider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > Hi Nicolas, > > if i see right, you use the nvidia 171.06 driver? > Why you use an beta driver? > > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=NjM0Mw > http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=987

Re: Nvidia driver

2008-03-31 Thread Theo Schneider
Hi Nicolas, if i see right, you use the nvidia 171.06 driver? Why you use an beta driver? http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=NjM0Mw http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=987&num=1 Latest stable release was 169.12 mfg Theo Nicolas FRANCOIS schrieb: > Le Mon, 31 Mar

Re: Nvidia driver

2008-03-31 Thread Nicolas FRANCOIS
Le Mon, 31 Mar 2008 21:36:39 +0200 "Wilco Beekhuizen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > Do you have an official Nvidia release from nvidia.com? Yes. > Have you enabled the drivers for your motherboard in the kernel? This, my LFS friend, I don't really know, this is the first time since my old PII

Re: Nvidia driver

2008-03-31 Thread Wilco Beekhuizen
/nvidia0 (Function not > implemented) > > I think I saw the driver work for a Mandriva, so this must be me missing > some obvious point, but Googling the error message didn't work out as > well as I would have thought. > > When I look at dmesg after loading the nvidia dri

Nvidia driver

2008-03-31 Thread Nicolas FRANCOIS
, but Googling the error message didn't work out as well as I would have thought. When I look at dmesg after loading the nvidia driver, I see this : NVRM: request_irq() failed (-38) What can I do to solve my problem ? Is it a BIOS problem, a driver problem... Thanks for any help.

Re: NVIDIA driver and kernel >= 2.6.13.

2005-10-30 Thread channelzero
Am Sonntag 30 Oktober 2005 04:45 schrieb Stef Bon: > Hello, > > I've had some problems with the NVIDIA driver (version 7174) to work > properly with the latest kernels 2.6.13.* and 2.6.14 (latest). > Hi, if I install a new kernel, I only have to reinstall Nvidia driver, start

Re: NVIDIA driver and kernel >= 2.6.13.

2005-10-30 Thread Stef Bon
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote: > > Which version of udev? > My version of udev is 0.63. Stef Bon -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Re: NVIDIA driver and kernel >= 2.6.13.

2005-10-30 Thread Simon Geard
On Sun, 2005-10-30 at 04:45 +0100, Stef Bon wrote: > Hello, > > I've had some problems with the NVIDIA driver (version 7174) to work > properly with the latest kernels 2.6.13.* and 2.6.14 (latest). Have you tried the 7676 drivers, which are the latest version? Don't know i

Re: NVIDIA driver and kernel >= 2.6.13.

2005-10-29 Thread Alexander E. Patrakov
Stef Bon wrote: Hello, I've had some problems with the NVIDIA driver (version 7174) to work properly with the latest kernels 2.6.13.* and 2.6.14 (latest). X did not start anymore. I got messages about not able to load the driver. Now after some research the module is loaded properly,

NVIDIA driver and kernel >= 2.6.13.

2005-10-29 Thread Stef Bon
Hello, I've had some problems with the NVIDIA driver (version 7174) to work properly with the latest kernels 2.6.13.* and 2.6.14 (latest). X did not start anymore. I got messages about not able to load the driver. Now after some research the module is loaded properly, as a kernelmodule. T