Nicolas FRANCOIS wrote:
Le Wed, 29 Nov 2006 23:55:28 + Reece Dunn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a
écrit :
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tapio Kelloniemi wrote:
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 09:25:18AM -0500, Chris Staub wrote:
No, it's not - it is completely unnecessary. $LFS/sources is only
mentioned once in
Le Wed, 29 Nov 2006 23:55:28 + Reece Dunn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a
écrit :
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Tapio Kelloniemi wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 09:25:18AM -0500, Chris Staub wrote:
> > >> No, it's not - it is completely unnecessary. $LFS/sources is only
> > >> mentioned once in
Reece Dunn wrote:
I use a perl script that does the same thing as:
cd /build
tar -xf /packages/$PACKAGE/$PACKAGE-$VERSION.tar.*
cd `ls`
/packages/$PACKAGE/$PACKAGE # run the build script
cd /build
rm -r *
This is very dangerous and should be avoided at all costs.
One shoul
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Tapio Kelloniemi wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 09:25:18AM -0500, Chris Staub wrote:
> >> No, it's not - it is completely unnecessary. $LFS/sources is only
> >> mentioned once in LFS (well, ok, twice...), and even then it's really
> >> just a suggestion - the sour
Le Sun, 26 Nov 2006 17:02:15 +0200 Tapio Kelloniemi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a
écrit :
> What about this (just one example among others). This command can be found
> from the SVN LFS book in one of the GCC sections:
> patch -Np1 -i ../gcc-4.1.1-specs-1.patch
>
> This command is to be executed in the g
Nicolas FRANCOIS wrote:
Hi.
I've been an LFS user for quite a long time now, and there's one thing
(only ONE thing !) I don't like in the books : I'm used to put all the
packages I download in a directory just above /sources
(namely /sources/LFS or /sources/BLFS), and when I install a package,
t
