Hans-Joachim Widmaier wrote:
> Following up on my own musings ...
... a second time
> Compiling OO 2.1.0 on a second machine failed. As I use identical
> scripts to build 4 machines (although I do use slightly different
> optimization flags (which are ignored by Openoffice anyway) and although
Following up on my own musings ...
Compiling OO 2.1.0 on a second machine failed. As I use identical
scripts to build 4 machines (although I do use slightly different
optimization flags (which are ignored by Openoffice anyway) and although
the build sequence is not always synchronous, but as lo
Thierry Nuttens wrote:
[...]
If somebody have an idea, I would be very happy, otherwise I will have
to stay with 2.0.4
By the way I could compile without problems version 2.0.3 then later 2.0.4
Ain't it funny that I couldn't compile 2.0.3 or 2.0.4 for the life of
me? Now I tried again with 2.
