Jeremy Byron wrote:
I don't have any more time to look into this tonight, and I'm going to
be pretty busy over the next few days with classes/assignments.. I'll
keep an eye on the mailing list though, and help out as much as I can.
Ok, I lied.. decided to stay up late, but I'll probably pay
David Ciecierski wrote:
Just touching the *1.2.9.patch is sufficient to move on (until you
have to replace the empty file later.. heh).
It's that need to replace keytrans that puzzles me most. Btw: I recall
there was a section in the makefile that I claimed responsible for that
and commented
Just touching the *1.2.9.patch is sufficient to move
on (until you have to replace the empty file later.. heh).
It's that need to replace keytrans that puzzles me most. Btw: I recall
there was a section in the makefile that I claimed responsible for that
and commented out. After deleting the w
David Ciecierski wrote:
I came across the same, but I went to check that keytrans only after
quite some digging + googling... The reason behind the file's content
being erased still puzzles me - the 1.2.6 should not get applied, as we
manually set 1.2.9. But true enough, seems the only way such
[code]
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../.. -DPACKAGE=\"xmlsec1\" -I../..
-I../../include -D__XMLSEC_FUNCTION__=__FUNCTION__ -DXMLSEC_NO_XSLT=1
-DXMLSEC_NO_XKMS=1 -I/opt/firefox/include/firefox-1.0.6/nspr
-I/opt/firefox/include/firefox-1.0.6/nss -DXMLSEC_CRYPTO_NSS=1
-I/usr/include/libxml2 -O3
That's from back at m118, but should still give you a good idea of what
to expect. I know David Ciecierski (as he mentioned elsewhere in this
thread) is working with those on current beta2 (m126 IIRC).
I indeed am. It's such a pity the box I'm compiling it on is rather
sluggish (P3 600), this
DJ Lucas wrote:
OOo-2.0 is a monster and takes quite a few hours to complete a full
build...but if you have a fast PC, go for it :-) The more eyes on it
Athlon-fx 53. In other words, I get nice quick build failures.. lol
LFS: SVN-20050910
the better...gcc4 _should_ not be an issue at all W
Jeremy Byron wrote:
> Well, for what it's worth, attached are some patches to help get things
> started. I've cleaned up what I could from the 1.1.4 patches (not
> including the gcc patch) but the java patch still needs work.
>
> Many sections from the java patch no longer exist in OOo2, but I us
Well, for what it's worth, attached are some patches to help get things
started.
Thanks a lot Jeremy; a pity I had TBird closed while going through OOo
source & available patches... I'll go through them later and see if I
missed something.
OOs's compiling now, and since it's going to take sev
Well, for what it's worth, attached are some patches to help get things
started. I've cleaned up what I could from the 1.1.4 patches (not
including the gcc patch) but the java patch still needs work.
Many sections from the java patch no longer exist in OOo2, but I used
'grep -lr' to scan the
10 matches
Mail list logo
