On 11/19/05, Doug Ronne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > In fact, I can't run any program when LD_ASSUME_KERNEL is set to 2.4.0.
> > For instance running /bin/ls:
>
> What is the LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.0 supposed to be for? It was
> suggested that I needed it to get Matlab 7.0 working, but I had
> sim
Alle 06:18, domenica 20 novembre 2005, DJ Lucas ha scritto:
> CC'd to LFS-Dev for review:
>
> Gerard Beekmans wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /opt/openoffice.org2.0/program/soffice -display :0.0
> > Inconsistency detected by ld.so: ../sysdeps/generic/dl-tls.c: 72:
> > _dl_next_tls_modid: Assertion
On Sat, 2005-11-19 at 23:18 -0600, DJ Lucas wrote:
> CC'd to LFS-Dev for review:
>
> Gerard Beekmans wrote:
>
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /opt/openoffice.org2.0/program/soffice -display :0.0
> > Inconsistency detected by ld.so: ../sysdeps/generic/dl-tls.c: 72:
> > _dl_next_tls_modid: Assertion
CC'd to LFS-Dev for review:
Gerard Beekmans wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /opt/openoffice.org2.0/program/soffice -display :0.0
Inconsistency detected by ld.so: ../sysdeps/generic/dl-tls.c: 72:
_dl_next_tls_modid: Assertion `result <=
_rtld_local._dl_tls_max_dtv_idx' failed!
In fact, I ca
> > I'd hold off for now. Gerard is seeing the same issue with the
> > precompiled version. Can I suggest you try the following real quick and
> > see if it resolves the issue?
> >
> > 'LD_ASSUME_KERNEL=2.4.0 swriter'
> >
> > If that works, then we are in the ballpark. Gerard, if you are watchin
DJ Lucas wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ soffice -display 0:0
That one isn't working for me:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ /opt/openoffice.org2.0/program/soffice -display 0:0
_X11TransSocketINETConnect() can't get address for 0:6000: Name or
service not known
_X11TransSocketINETConnect() can't get address
Alessandro wrote:
Hy,
thanks for the help, i'm going to fix the wrong libmawt.so lib link.
However, I run a java-1.0.5_02 version compiled from source but perhaps I
missed
something during compilation.
After you asked:
What flavor and version of X and glibc? Did you use the patch set in
the
Hy,
thanks for the help, i'm going to fix the wrong libmawt.so lib link.
However, I run a java-1.0.5_02 version compiled from source but perhaps I
missed
something during compilation.
After you asked:
> What flavor and version of X and glibc? Did you use the patch set in
> the BOOK? Any additio
Alessandro wrote:
Hi,
I have just compiled open-office on my LFS_SVN-20050322
with two problems.
First, during compilation the script solenv/bin/checkdll.sh
failed with the message "Unable to find libmawt.so"
In fact the script have several -L... including
-L/opt/jdk/jdk/jre/lib/i386 but not
/opt
Hy,
yes you're right, a ln -s is more clear solution.
Thanks, Alessandro
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Hi Alessandro
First, during compilation the script solenv/bin/checkdll.sh
failed with the message "Unable to find libmawt.so"
In fact the script have several -L... including
-L/opt/jdk/jdk/jre/lib/i386 but not
/opt/jdk/jdk/jre/lib/i386/xawt/libmawt.so where I have the
library on my installation
Hi,
I have just compiled open-office on my LFS_SVN-20050322
with two problems.
First, during compilation the script solenv/bin/checkdll.sh
failed with the message "Unable to find libmawt.so"
In fact the script have several -L... including
-L/opt/jdk/jdk/jre/lib/i386 but not
/opt/jdk/jdk/jre/lib/i38
12 matches
Mail list logo