On 07/05/2010 11:01 AM, Andrew Benton wrote:
> On 05/07/10 14:02, Dan McGhee wrote:
>
>> Andy, this shows how out of touch I am. There's a 64-bit version of
>> Flash?
>>
> Yeah, I can't find a download link on the internet at the moment, I
> think Adobe have stopped offering it for downlo
On 5 July 2010 17:01, Andrew Benton wrote:
> On 05/07/10 14:02, Dan McGhee wrote:
>> Andy, this shows how out of touch I am. There's a 64-bit version of
>> Flash?
>
> Yeah, I can't find a download link on the internet at the moment, I
> think Adobe have stopped offering it for download. I don't kn
On 07/05/2010 10:15 AM, William Immendorf wrote:
> Oh, and doesn't NWS use Java for it's radar rendering? I think
> it does, so there is almost no reason to build multilib.
>
>
By Jove, you're right! So here I go.
Thanks for the other info and link too.
Dan
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mai
On 05/07/10 14:02, Dan McGhee wrote:
> Andy, this shows how out of touch I am. There's a 64-bit version of
> Flash?
Yeah, I can't find a download link on the internet at the moment, I
think Adobe have stopped offering it for download. I don't know why. I
could email you a copy of the one I have
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 8:02 AM, Dan McGhee wrote:
> Andy, this shows how out of touch I am. There's a 64-bit version of
> Flash? Guess I need to do some more reading and research. Is it just
> that Adobe developed one and left it for awhile? If this is all true,
> then there's no reason to do a mu
On 07/05/2010 06:47 AM, Andrew Benton wrote:
>
> I find current Firefox to be very slow/laggy watching webm. The 64 bit
> flash still works better, sadly. Midori/webkit-gtk is much better. No
> lag there and it will play h264 videos.
>
> The only things I can't get working on 64 bit are precompiled
On 07/05/2010 06:29 AM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On 5 July 2010 01:31, Dan McGhee wrote:
>
>
>> William, thanks very much. This really helps. I do like YouTube, but I
>> can probably live without it.
>>
> The html5 beta works in epiphany-2.30 (no controls) and midori - in
> both cases, bu
On 05/07/10 00:34, William Immendorf wrote:
> I've done 64-bit system for some good experimentation, and really, the
> only package(s) in BLFS that don't play nice with 64-bit systems are
> NSS/NSPR. But that can be fixed easily by adding --enable-64bit to
> NSPR's configure, and by exporting USE_6
On 5 July 2010 01:31, Dan McGhee wrote:
> William, thanks very much. This really helps. I do like YouTube, but I
> can probably live without it.
The html5 beta works in epiphany-2.30 (no controls) and midori - in
both cases, built on top of gnome-2.30 (for exact package versions
see my long p
On 07/04/2010 06:34 PM, William Immendorf wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Dan McGhee wrote:
>
>> I could build a CLFS-Multilib system and try to compile the "newer"
>> packages from LFS. But that smacks of not "following the book" for
>> either build. Is there a place I can go for no
On Sun, Jul 4, 2010 at 5:05 PM, Dan McGhee wrote:
> I could build a CLFS-Multilib system and try to compile the "newer"
> packages from LFS. But that smacks of not "following the book" for
> either build. Is there a place I can go for notes, work arounds or
> patches for packages in BLFS that don
I'm preparing for another build. The last one I did was CLFS-multilib,
but, in looking at CLFS, LFS-svn seems to be a little more advanced. In
particular I noticed that CLFS still uses grub-0.97 and LFS uses
grub-1.98. I'm running Ubuntu 10.04 LTS and have become accustomed to
the "new" grub
12 matches
Mail list logo
