Casey Daniels wrote:
> I finally was able to finish my first LFS system and it was a fun time.
> Now I have some questions. I plan on building my second build that I
> actually plan on using but didn't understand much about Package
> Management or Upgrading. From the Short info in the Book i
On Tue, 2011-02-08 at 17:00 -0500, Casey Daniels wrote:
> How specific do you mean when it comes to architecture? something as
> generic as 64 bit? or you talking more specific down to AMD or Intel and
> what flags the CPU has? Generally I will do most of my work on a laptop
> which has a AMD
On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 05:00:46PM -0500, Casey Daniels wrote:
> > I have no opinion on your preferred package management. In theory,
> > build once, run on multiple machines of the same architecture
> > *probably* works. Certainly, LFS does its best to build down to a
> > "lowest common denomi
> I have no opinion on your preferred package management. In theory,
> build once, run on multiple machines of the same architecture
> *probably* works. Certainly, LFS does its best to build down to a
> "lowest common denominator" (i486 when most people with 32-bit x86
> can probably use i686).
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 05:34:56PM -0500, Casey Daniels wrote:
> I finally was able to finish my first LFS system and it was a fun time.
> Now I have some questions. I plan on building my second build that I
> actually plan on using but didn't understand much about Package
> Management or Upg
I finally was able to finish my first LFS system and it was a fun time.
Now I have some questions. I plan on building my second build that I
actually plan on using but didn't understand much about Package
Management or Upgrading. From the Short info in the Book it looks like
the Symlink Met
