Re: OpenOffice-2.0.3

2007-05-06 Thread Fix
On 5/4/07, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Don't be confused, do a bit of research instead. Because if you > did, you'd see that Apache Ant is required by OpenOffice and the > JDK is required by Apache Ant. So, the JDK *is* required by > OpenOffice according to BLFS. :-) Java is not

Re: OpenOffice-2.0.3

2007-05-04 Thread michael lang
On 04/05/07, Tijnema ! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 5/4/07, michael lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 04/05/07, Tijnema ! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Did you checked the log file that was created? Maybe you can send it > > to this list so that others can take a look at it and find o

Re: OpenOffice-2.0.3

2007-05-04 Thread Tijnema !
On 5/4/07, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tijnema ! wrote: > > > I checked the BLFS book for OpenOffice, and i'm confused now, java > > isn't listed as a dependency there. (No JRE/JDK) > > Don't be confused, do a bit of research instead. Because if you > did, you'd see that Apache Ant

Re: OpenOffice-2.0.3

2007-05-04 Thread Randy McMurchy
Tijnema ! wrote: > I checked the BLFS book for OpenOffice, and i'm confused now, java > isn't listed as a dependency there. (No JRE/JDK) Don't be confused, do a bit of research instead. Because if you did, you'd see that Apache Ant is required by OpenOffice and the JDK is required by Apache Ant.

Re: OpenOffice-2.0.3

2007-05-04 Thread Tijnema !
On 5/4/07, michael lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 04/05/07, Tijnema ! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Did you checked the log file that was created? Maybe you can send it > > to this list so that others can take a look at it and find out where > > the actual problem is. > > > > Tijnema >

Re: OpenOffice-2.0.3

2007-05-04 Thread michael lang
On 04/05/07, Tijnema ! <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Did you checked the log file that was created? Maybe you can send it to this list so that others can take a look at it and find out where the actual problem is. Tijnema Yeh, I took a look, but grew rather confused. The file is attached with

Re: OpenOffice-2.0.3

2007-05-04 Thread Tijnema !
On 5/4/07, michael lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Would it matter if I didn't compile the JDK, but just use the pre-compiled, > downloadable version from sun? Anyways, I tried upgrading to jdk1.6.0_01, > instead of using jdk1.5.0_11, and I still get the same message. And yes, I > did edit all th

Re: OpenOffice-2.0.3

2007-05-04 Thread michael lang
Would it matter if I didn't compile the JDK, but just use the pre-compiled, downloadable version from sun? Anyways, I tried upgrading to jdk1.6.0_01, instead of using jdk1.5.0_11, and I still get the same message. And yes, I did edit all the environment variables accordingly. -- http://linuxfroms

Re: OpenOffice-2.0.3

2007-05-03 Thread Tijnema !
On 5/3/07, michael lang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > After compiling for errors, I painfully got the following error of which a > quick google search showed up 0 results: > > java -Xms256m -Xmx256m > -Djava.library.path=/home/oipo/BLFS/OOC680_m7/solver/680/unxlngi6.pro/lib > -Djavax.xml.parsers.SAX

Re: OpenOffice-2.0.3 configure errors

2006-09-19 Thread Luca
Luca wrote: > Luca wrote: > >> Guillaume Chevallereau wrote: >> >> >>> Selon Luca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>> >>> >>> another problem with sound-cards, I have a M Audio Audiophile 24/96 and a SoundBlaster Audigy, compiled the drivers as modules and insert the f

Re: OpenOffice-2.0.3 configure errors

2006-09-19 Thread Luca
Luca wrote: > Guillaume Chevallereau wrote: > >> Selon Luca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> >> >>> another problem with sound-cards, I have a M Audio Audiophile 24/96 and >>> a SoundBlaster Audigy, compiled the drivers as modules and insert the >>> following in /etc/modprobe.conf >>> "options sn

Re: OpenOffice-2.0.3 configure errors

2006-09-19 Thread Luca
Guillaume Chevallereau wrote: > Selon Luca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> another problem with sound-cards, I have a M Audio Audiophile 24/96 and >> a SoundBlaster Audigy, compiled the drivers as modules and insert the >> following in /etc/modprobe.conf >> "options snd-emu10k1 index=0 >> options snd-

Re: OpenOffice-2.0.3 configure errors

2006-09-19 Thread Guillaume Chevallereau
Selon Luca <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > another problem with sound-cards, I have a M Audio Audiophile 24/96 and > a SoundBlaster Audigy, compiled the drivers as modules and insert the > following in /etc/modprobe.conf > "options snd-emu10k1 index=0 > options snd-ice1712 index=1" but in the applet volume

Re: OpenOffice-2.0.3 configure errors

2006-09-18 Thread rblythe
Luca wrote: Hi... again ! Well the configuration of OpenOffice took place but in the making it ends up with: ./configure: line 24672: /usr/lib/pkgconfig:/usr/X11R7/lib/pkgconfig:/usr/local/lib/pkgconfig:/opt/gnome-1.4/lib/pkgconfig:/opt/gnome-2.14.2/lib/pkgconfig:/opt/gnome/lib/pkgconfig:/op

Re: OpenOffice-2.0.3 configure errors

2006-09-18 Thread Luca
Hi... again ! Well the configuration of OpenOffice took place but in the making it ends up with: ./configure: line 24672: /usr/lib/pkgconfig:/usr/X11R7/lib/pkgconfig:/usr/local/lib/pkgconfig:/opt/gnome-1.4/lib/pkgconfig:/opt/gnome-2.14.2/lib/pkgconfig:/opt/gnome/lib/pkgconfig:/opt/kde-3.5.4/li

Re: OpenOffice-2.0.3 configure errors

2006-09-18 Thread Luca
Hi again! Solved the problem with OpenOffice by passing all environment settings like CFLAGS and LIBS and exporting PKG_CONFIG to configure script, however I still have the other two problems I told. N.B. In order for gcc configured with java language to work it's necessary to pass "--with-x