Hurray
DJ Lucas wrote:
>>
>> Thanks a lot, it's building again and vcl is passed already!!!
>>
>
> Great! Let us know how it works out. :-)
>
The build has finished! Hurray!!
Stef Bon
Voorburg
The Netherlands
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www
Stef Bon wrote:
What do you mean with -lgdk-x11-2.0 is not in the linker flags? They should
be?
I've read the messages about this in dev, and is gdk-2.0 indirectly
dependend op gdk-1.2 or something alike? That's the reason why it's not
needed with 0.20?
Sorry, I was rambling about th
On Friday 25 November 2005 06:12, DJ Lucas wrote:
>
> I assume you mean the old gdkpixbuf from gnome 1.4 in the above. To
> help you figure out how to debug a failure like this, I greped
> /usr/include for the reference above 'gdk_xll_display_get_xdisplay'.
> You should find that /usr/include/gtk
Stef Bon wrote:
Making: ../unxlngi6.pro/lib/libvclplug_gtk680li.so
g++ -Wl,-z,combreloc -Wl,-z,defs -Wl,-rpath,'$ORIGIN' -shared
-L../unxlngi6.pro/lib -L../lib
-L/root/source-local/openoffice-cvs/OOo_2.0.0rc3_src/solenv/unxlngi6/lib
-L/root/source-local/openoffice-cvs/OOo_2.0.0rc3_src/solver/
Hello,
I'm still having problems compiling OO 2.0.
I've used the patches from:
http://www.doc.ic.ac.uk/~dfc04/OOo_2.0.0/
and I'm using the following configure command:
./configure --prefix=/opt/openoffice-2.0 --enable-libart --enable-libsn
--enable-openldap --disable-fontooo --without-fonts -
