On Tuesday 21 September 2010 00:04:52 linux fan wrote:
> I know nothing of the cups hal thing,
>
> but without using hal, there was this monstrosity:
> >> new USB CUPS backend. For this backend the
> >> "usblp" kernel module must be unloaded.
> >> http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/blfs-dev/201
I know nothing of the cups hal thing,
but without using hal, there was this monstrosity:
>> new USB CUPS backend. For this backend the
>> "usblp" kernel module must be unloaded.
>> http://linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/blfs-dev/2010-September/020617.html
requiring that if usblp is a module, that i
On Monday 20 September 2010 21:55:28 linux fan wrote:
> On 9/20/10, luxInteg wrote:
> > E [20/Sep/2010:19:32:22 +0100] [cups-driverd] Bad driver information file
> > "/usr/share/cups/model/foomatic-db-ppds/Kyocera/ReadMe.htm"!
>
> This looks fubar. ReadMe.htm could not be a ppd file.
> browser ->
On 9/20/10, luxInteg wrote:
> E [20/Sep/2010:19:32:22 +0100] [cups-driverd] Bad driver information file
> "/usr/share/cups/model/foomatic-db-ppds/Kyocera/ReadMe.htm"!
This looks fubar. ReadMe.htm could not be a ppd file.
browser -> localhost:631 and try picking a better one
--
http://linuxfrom
On Monday 20 September 2010 02:23:53 DJ Lucas wrote:
>
> Did you try the suggested change to a non-numeric value? I should have a
> full Gnome desktop to test with next weekend. Unfortunately, I don't have
> the hardware to test with. pstoraster-> file?
I upgraded to gpl-ghostscript-9.00
On Monday 20 September 2010 02:23:53 DJ Lucas wrote:
> Did you try the suggested change to a non-numeric value?
yes I tried ato
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
"luxInteg" wrote:
>
>Thanks for the link. Ghostscript and linux-printing in general is in
>transition to make use of large memory available acording to the link ( copy
>ALL and paste in browser) below:-
>
>http://www.listware.net/201007/linux-cups/101252-cupsgeneral-sense-and-
>nonsense-of
On Saturday 18 September 2010 17:39:57 DJ Lucas wrote:
> On 09/16/2010 03:48 PM, luxInteg wrote:
> > I came across this recently debugging a problematic cups installation:-
> > " /usr/lib/cups/pstoraster failed"
> >
> > I have cups-1.4.4 with gnu-ghostscriot-8.71 installed
> >
> > Now there has
On 09/16/2010 03:48 PM, luxInteg wrote:
> I came across this recently debugging a problematic cups installation:-
> " /usr/lib/cups/pstoraster failed"
>
> I have cups-1.4.4 with gnu-ghostscriot-8.71 installed
>
> Now there has been no release of esp-ghostscript for ~2 years.
> does one still nee
On Friday 17 September 2010 05:01:07 linux fan wrote:
> On 9/16/10, luxInteg wrote:
> > does one still need esp-ghostscript for latest versions of cups?
>
> No.
>
> I just installed cups-1.4.4 and ghostscript-8.71 and hplip-2.8.12.
> I use the foomatic method to service cheap, old, well function
On 9/16/10, luxInteg wrote:
> does one still need esp-ghostscript for latest versions of cups?
No.
I just installed cups-1.4.4 and ghostscript-8.71 and hplip-2.8.12.
I use the foomatic method to service cheap, old, well functioning hp
deskjet 3320 that is excluded in glutenprint (so I no gluten
I came across this recently debugging a problematic cups installation:-
" /usr/lib/cups/pstoraster failed"
I have cups-1.4.4 with gnu-ghostscriot-8.71 installed
Now there has been no release of esp-ghostscript for ~2 years.
does one still need esp-ghostscript for latest versions of cups?
--
htt
12 matches
Mail list logo
