Re: fop-0.95 compile problems//minimal Xorg for Xvfb??// fop with GCJ

2010-01-07 Thread Matthew Burgess
On Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:23:56 +, lux-integ wrote: > On Tuesday 22 December 2009 06:24:27 pm Hops Error, Line 21, alcoholi.c > wrote: > >> I don't recall which environment variable ant uses to pass flags to >> java off the top of my head, though. It couldn't be anything simple >> like JFLAGS :p

Re: fop-0.95 compile problems//minimal Xorg for Xvfb??// fop with GCJ

2010-01-07 Thread lux-integ
On Tuesday 22 December 2009 06:24:27 pm Hops Error, Line 21, alcoholi.c wrote: > I don't recall which environment variable ant uses to pass flags to > java off the top of my head, though. It couldn't be anything simple > like JFLAGS :p compiling FOP with GCJ may be of interest to some on list

Re: fop-0.95 compile problems//and regarding foprc

2010-01-06 Thread lux-integ
On Monday 21 December 2009 11:03:38 pm William Immendorf wrote: > > Advice/suggestions welcomed. > > This is what I do: > > Vi build.xml, and in the all target, remove the junit in the depends line. > Thanks a lot. I tried your suggestion and Initially I had [exec] BUILD FAILED [exec] /op

Re: fop-0.95 compile problems//minimal Xorg for Xvfb??

2009-12-23 Thread lux-integ
On Tuesday 22 December 2009 06:24:27 pm Hops Error, Line 21, alcoholi.c wrote: > Just taking a gander at their documentation, it looks like you can > avoid altering source altogether with the > -Dawt.toolkit=com.eteks.awt.PJAToolkit > flag on the command line. That looks like it's using a native a

Re: fop-0.95 compile problems//minimal Xorg for Xvfb??

2009-12-22 Thread Hops Error, Line 21, alcoholi.c
Did a little bit of searching, other people in your situation (need AWT, no X windows) say they use PJA (http://www.eteks.com/pja/en/). Here's their boast "When no X11 Display is available on a UNIX machine (also called headless environment) or when GDI resources are low on Windows, it is impossib

Re: fop-0.95 compile problems//minimal Xorg for Xvfb??

2009-12-21 Thread Simon Geard
On Tue, 2009-12-22 at 01:02 +, lux-integ wrote: > thanks for the suggestion. A more detailed reading of :- > http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.95/graphics.html > > would suggest FOP ideally needs an X-server installed. Well, that page offers three suggestions - to run Java headless,

Re: fop-0.95 compile problems//minimal Xorg for Xvfb??

2009-12-21 Thread lux-integ
On Monday 21 December 2009 11:03:38 pm William Immendorf wrote: > > Advice/suggestions welcomed. > > This is what I do: > > Vi build.xml, and in the all target, remove the junit in the depends line. > William Immendorf thanks for the suggestion. A more detailed reading of :- http://xmlgraphics.

Re: fop-0.95 compile problems

2009-12-21 Thread William Immendorf
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 1:38 PM, lux-integ wrote: > I do not have X-windows installed  as   the tentative application is in  a > network  server. > > > > Advice/suggestions welcomed. This is what I do: Vi build.xml, and in the all target, remove the junit in the depends line. -- William Immend

fop-0.95 compile problems

2009-12-21 Thread lux-integ
Greetings,  I am trying to   compile fop-0.95  on a linux box   with the following features: CPU:  AMD64 sempron 2GBytes of RAM, linux -distribution:   clfs,   kernel-2.6.32, GCC4.4.2, jdk-6u17-linux-x64.bin, apache-ant-1.7.1/junit-4.3.1 (compiled as given  here:-   http://www.linuxfromscratch.o