Re: icedtea on amd64

2011-04-19 Thread DJ Lucas
On 04/19/2011 03:08 PM, luxInteg wrote: > On Tuesday 19 April 2011 01:14:04 DJ Lucas wrote: > >> I honestly don't know. I didn't think it was not possible to *build* it Ugh...that should have read: "I didn't think it was possible..." >> without GTK, but the java binary doesn't link to GTK+ librarie

Re: icedtea on amd64

2011-04-19 Thread luxInteg
On Tuesday 19 April 2011 01:14:04 DJ Lucas wrote: > I honestly don't know. I didn't think it was not possible to *build* it > without GTK, but the java binary doesn't link to GTK+ libraries > directly, and certainly runs without them handy. My guess is that > they've removed anything requiring GTK

Re: icedtea on amd64

2011-04-18 Thread DJ Lucas
On 04/18/2011 06:05 PM, William Tracy wrote: > On Friday 28 January 2011 11:28:07 luxInteg wrote: >> Greetings >> >> I want to have a go at building openjdk using icedtea. >> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/cvs/general/icedtea6.html >> I notice that a binary is needed presumeably

Re: icedtea on amd64

2011-04-18 Thread William Tracy
Debian and company ship 'headless' Java packages, so I know it's possible: http://packages.debian.org/squeeze/openjdk-6-jre-headless William Tracy Work: wtr...@cisco.com Play: afishion...@gmail.com Cell phone: (805) 704-0917 Internet phone: (707) 206-6441 On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 11:26 AM, luxInt

Re: icedtea on amd64

2011-04-18 Thread luxInteg
On Friday 28 January 2011 11:28:07 luxInteg wrote: > Greetings > > I want to have a go at building openjdk using icedtea. > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/cvs/general/icedtea6.html > I notice that a binary is needed presumeably for so-called > 'bootstraping' and the one available fr

Re: icedtea on amd64

2011-03-07 Thread Nathan Coulson
actually I just wanted it linked to /lib/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 instead of /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 I'll take a look, thank you. On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 9:06 AM, DJ Lucas wrote: > On 02/28/2011 06:59 PM, Nathan Coulson wrote: > > > > > It has always been my dream to build java w/o the binary pa

Re: icedtea on amd64

2011-03-05 Thread DJ Lucas
On 02/28/2011 06:59 PM, Nathan Coulson wrote: > > It has always been my dream to build java w/o the binary part. The "binary" icedtea6 is just a kit I compile and test myself, and then tar'd up for use in bootstrapping, there are no closed source parts left. There are instructions are in the wi

Re: icedtea on amd64

2011-02-28 Thread Nathan Coulson
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 6:59 AM, DJ Lucas wrote: > On 01/28/2011 05:28 AM, luxInteg wrote: > > Greetings > > > > I want to have a go at building openjdk using icedtea. > > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/cvs/general/icedtea6.html > > I notice that a binary is needed presumeably for

Re: icedtea on amd64

2011-01-29 Thread DJ Lucas
On 01/28/2011 05:28 AM, luxInteg wrote: > Greetings > > I want to have a go at building openjdk using icedtea. > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/cvs/general/icedtea6.html > I notice that a binary is needed presumeably for so-called 'bootstraping' > and the one available from blfs is f

icedtea on amd64

2011-01-28 Thread luxInteg
Greetings I want to have a go at building openjdk using icedtea. http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/cvs/general/icedtea6.html I notice that a binary is needed presumeably for so-called 'bootstraping' and the one available from blfs is for 32-bit pentium cpu's. I am dabbling with 64-