Re: liba52 make fail//xmms compile///tunepimp(s)

2009-03-26 Thread lux-integ
On Saturday 20 December 2008 09:31:40 pm b-vol wrote: > ### attempt to install libtunepimp-0.5.3 (as alternative) > a) libofa patched is recommended. Below is the result with the patch > ( libofa-0.9.3-uopdate_to_r8438.patch some 3mBytes! large ) correctly > applied:- > > ###libofa

Re: liba52 make fail//xmms compile///tunepimp(s)

2008-12-20 Thread Ken Moffat
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 09:31:40PM +, b-vol wrote: > On Saturday 20 December 2008 03:31:26 pm Ken Moffat wrote: > [...] > On Saturday 20 December 2008 03:31:26 pm Ken Moffat wrote: yeah, I echo! but, please can you trim what you are replying to. thnx. > > First suggestion - drop anything

Re: liba52 make fail//xmms compile///tunepimp(s)

2008-12-20 Thread b-vol
On Saturday 20 December 2008 03:31:26 pm Ken Moffat wrote: > On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 11:16:23PM +, b-vol wrote: > > thanks before I saw your email I managed to compile with share libraries > > using CFLAGS="$BUILD64 -fPIC" . I have now tried with > > CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -fPIC". > > Both work. Wh

Re: liba52 make fail//xmms compile

2008-12-20 Thread Ken Moffat
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 11:16:23PM +, b-vol wrote: > > thanks before I saw your email I managed to compile with share libraries > using CFLAGS="$BUILD64 -fPIC" . I have now tried with > CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -fPIC". > Both work. Which is better? > On clfs they are currently identical - the

Re: liba52 make fail//xmms compile

2008-12-19 Thread b-vol
On Friday 19 December 2008 02:28:08 pm Ken Moffat wrote: > On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 01:28:19PM +0200, Lauri Kasanen wrote: > > Hello > > > > Using static libraries does not prevent linking them, it just might be > > more complicated. However, for the original problem, build requiring > > -fPIC, you

Re: liba52 make fail

2008-12-19 Thread Ken Moffat
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 02:28:08PM +, Ken Moffat wrote: > > for ffmpeg (the old snapshot still in BLFS) > OPTFLAGS="OPTFLAGS=-fPIC" > (I think this is not needed with recent snapshots). > Sorry, I copied that too quikly without looking. I seem to have deleted the command that used it, but I

Re: liba52 make fail

2008-12-19 Thread Ken Moffat
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 01:28:19PM +0200, Lauri Kasanen wrote: > > Hello > > Using static libraries does not prevent linking them, it just might be more > complicated. > However, for the original problem, build requiring -fPIC, you can just force > it by adding that flag to your CFLAGS and CXXF

Re: liba52 make fail

2008-12-19 Thread Lauri Kasanen
> > On 12/19/08, b-vol wrote: > > > Greetings > > > > > > I am having a spot of bother with compiling liba52 (the host > > is > Athlon64- 64bit build GCC 4.3.2) > > > > > > ## make failure liba52 > > > > > > gcc -shared bitstream.lo imdct.lo bit_allocate.lo parse.lo > > > downmix.lo -lm

Re: liba52 make fail

2008-12-19 Thread b-vol
On Friday 19 December 2008 03:25:55 am jignesh gangani wrote: > On 12/19/08, b-vol wrote: > > Greetings > > > > I am having a spot of bother with compiling liba52 (the host is > > Athlon64- 64bit build GCC 4.3.2) > > > > ## make failure liba52 > > > > gcc -shared bitstream.lo imdct.lo bit_

Re: liba52 make fail

2008-12-18 Thread jignesh gangani
On 12/19/08, b-vol wrote: > Greetings > > I am having a spot of bother with compiling liba52 (the host is Athlon64- > 64bit build GCC 4.3.2) > > ## make failure liba52 > > gcc -shared bitstream.lo imdct.lo bit_allocate.lo parse.lo > downmix.lo -lm -Wl,-soname -Wl,liba52.so.0 -o .libs/lib

liba52 make fail

2008-12-18 Thread b-vol
Greetings I am having a spot of bother with compiling liba52 (the host is Athlon64- 64bit build GCC 4.3.2) ## make failure liba52 gcc -shared bitstream.lo imdct.lo bit_allocate.lo parse.lo downmix.lo -lm -Wl,-soname -Wl,liba52.so.0 -o .libs/liba52.so.0.0.0 /usr/bin/ld: bitstream.lo: