On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 13:59 +, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 11:19:39PM +1300, Simon Geard wrote:
> > On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 09:15 +, Ken Moffat wrote:
> > > A very late follow-up to this: the xulrunner-1.9.0.3 and
> > > firefox-3.0.3-source tarballs are *identical*.
> >
> >
On Wed, Nov 05, 2008 at 11:19:39PM +1300, Simon Geard wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 09:15 +, Ken Moffat wrote:
> > A very late follow-up to this: the xulrunner-1.9.0.3 and
> > firefox-3.0.3-source tarballs are *identical*.
>
> Do you mean the contents are *completely* identical, or is the Xu
On Wed, 2008-11-05 at 09:15 +, Ken Moffat wrote:
> A very late follow-up to this: the xulrunner-1.9.0.3 and
> firefox-3.0.3-source tarballs are *identical*.
Do you mean the contents are *completely* identical, or is the Xulrunner
tarball just a subset of the other, without the bits that make
On Fri, Oct 17, 2008 at 11:10:02PM +1300, Simon Geard wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 22:19 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> > I haven't actually tried this, but you can also just grab the
> > xulrunner tarball:
> >
> > http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/xulrunner/releases/
> >
> > FWIW, I'm
On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 09:41 +0100, Richard Melville wrote:
> I'm not sure about the issue raised by Simon in relation to SQLite as
> i've only built against my system version.
If I remember correctly, the problem is that NSS bundles a copy of
sqlite3, which it a) builds against, and b) installs to
On Thu, 2008-10-16 at 22:19 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> I haven't actually tried this, but you can also just grab the
> xulrunner tarball:
>
> http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/xulrunner/releases/
>
> FWIW, I'm pretty sure fedora builds xulrunner from these tarballs and
> not from the
Just some further info -- I can confirm that xulrunner builds cleanly
from firefox 3 source. I've also gone on to build the latest versions
of VLC and Gnash against it and both the mozilla plugins appear to work
well.
I'm not sure about the issue raised by Simon in relation to SQLite as
i've only
On Thu, Oct 16, 2008 at 10:19:48PM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
>
> I haven't actually tried this, but you can also just grab the xulrunner
> tarball:
>
> http://releases.mozilla.org/pub/mozilla.org/xulrunner/releases/
>
> FWIW, I'm pretty sure fedora builds xulrunner from these tarballs and
> n
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 11:52 PM, Simon Geard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 16:39 +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 04:31:59PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
>> > I didn't know
>> > that the firefox code can build xulrunner, and I still don't
>> > understand that
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 16:39 +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 04:31:59PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> > I didn't know
> > that the firefox code can build xulrunner, and I still don't
> > understand that - in particular, where do you get the .pc files
> > which epiphany and yelp wil
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 04:31:59PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> I didn't know
> that the firefox code can build xulrunner, and I still don't
> understand that - in particular, where do you get the .pc files
> which epiphany and yelp will look for ?
>
Sorry, a bad 'find' on my part - I was looking
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 11:22:56PM +1300, Simon Geard wrote:
>
> Actually, you can build against Firefox3, it's just a bit more work.
> What you *can* do is use the Firefox sources to build and install the
> xulrunner application, which can be used to build yelp and epiphany. You
> can then build
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 00:01 +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> For anyone else tempted to try the webkit renderer with epiphany
> (and with the yelp branch) - expect problems. Sure, it all builds
> without any issues, but the text is "somewhat small" (or "too small
> to read" in yelp), and the Save As opt
For anyone else tempted to try the webkit renderer with epiphany
(and with the yelp branch) - expect problems. Sure, it all builds
without any issues, but the text is "somewhat small" (or "too small
to read" in yelp), and the Save As option in epiphany does nothing.
I suppose it's _possible_ th
14 matches
Mail list logo
