On Sun, 2014-08-24 at 16:44 +0200, ALZ (phyglos.org) wrote:
> The meaning of "recommended" and "required" is an editorial choice in
> the context of the book. My experience says that you better take
> recommended dependencies as required or first think about not building
> someone.
Correct. Tha
On Sun, Aug 24, 2014 at 09:20:38PM +0200, ALZ (phyglos.org) wrote:
>
> Next iteration in my scripts is to make testing optional.
> (I'm playing with gcc compilers and it's so boring to build one...)
>
> Maybe another entry in the FAQ page with regards to the benefits and
> practical use of tests
On 08/24/2014 08:11 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
We have always assumed that the recommended packages have been installed
for the BLFS instructions. I just made that more explicit in the "Notes
on Building Software" section:
I've seen it (now my Firefox refreshes correctly :-) ).
Probably this i
> Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 19:21:25 +0100
> From: lf...@cruziero.com (akhiezer)
> To: BLFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [blfs-support] libdrm-2.4.56 complains about pciaccess
>
- oops, replied to wrong msg: meant to be re Hazel's query re
'earlier'/util-linux ; whic
> Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2014 13:11:08 -0500
> From: Bruce Dubbs
> To: BLFS Support List
> Subject: Re: [blfs-support] libdrm-2.4.56 complains about pciaccess
>
> ALZ (phyglos.org) wrote:
> > On 08/24/2014 08:38 AM, ALZ (phyglos.org) wrote:
>
> > After reviewing the
ALZ (phyglos.org) wrote:
On 08/24/2014 08:38 AM, ALZ (phyglos.org) wrote:
After reviewing the scripts again and again, it turns out that there are
two issues over here.
First, libdrm-2.4.56 has to be build after Xorg libs, which are more
required than recommended.
We have always assumed tha
On 08/24/2014 05:16 PM, Ronnie van Aarle wrote:
Appologies, what I just said was wrong, the lib-7.7.md5 file is updated
in the development version of the book. But, indeed, building X
libraries from the dev version on top of xorg from the stable 7.5
version does not work.
Nothing to apologize,
Appologies, what I just said was wrong, the lib-7.7.md5 file is updated in
the development version of the book. But, indeed, building X libraries from
the dev version on top of xorg from the stable 7.5 version does not work.
Op 24 aug. 2014 17:03 schreef "ALZ (phyglos.org)" het
volgende:
> On 08/
On 08/24/2014 04:51 PM, Ronnie van Aarle wrote:
You using libdrm-2.4.56, but the stable book 7.5 uses 2.4.52. The
libraries in lib-7.7.md5 are as far as I checked identical to the
libraries used in stable 7.5.
Thanks. I was building last 7.5 SVN or that was what I believed.
Lesson learned, t
You using libdrm-2.4.56, but the stable book 7.5 uses 2.4.52. The libraries
in lib-7.7.md5 are as far as I checked identical to the libraries used in
stable 7.5.
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-support
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above
On 08/24/2014 04:06 PM, David Brodie wrote:
...
If you're building from the current SVN book, then libXfont is already
1.5.0, and everything builds OK.
(Also, regarding libdrm dependencies, since both Xorg Libraries and
libdrm are *required* for MesaLib, and Xorg Libraries are *recommended*
for
On 08/24/2014 04:01 PM, Armin K. wrote:
Required is a dep without which something can't be built no matter what
you do.
Recommended is a dep without which something can be built, but you may
have to use switches and will probably lose some functionality for
packages later on. So the book is cor
On 24/08/14 14:46, ALZ (phyglos.org) wrote:
...> but still get some tests not passed. Anyway, there is a second issue.
Now in Xorg libs, libXfont-1.4.8 fails with this requirement:
Requested 'fontsproto < 2.1.3' but version of FontsProto is 2.1.3
If you reverse to fonstproto-2.1.2 in Xorg pro
On 08/24/2014 03:46 PM, ALZ (phyglos.org) wrote:
> On 08/24/2014 08:38 AM, ALZ (phyglos.org) wrote:
>> On 08/24/2014 08:00 AM, ALZ (phyglos.org) wrote:
>>> On 08/24/2014 02:47 AM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 11:19:07PM +0200, ALZ (phyglos.org) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm bui
On 08/24/2014 08:38 AM, ALZ (phyglos.org) wrote:
On 08/24/2014 08:00 AM, ALZ (phyglos.org) wrote:
On 08/24/2014 02:47 AM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 11:19:07PM +0200, ALZ (phyglos.org) wrote:
Hi,
I'm building Xorg from BLFS last-SVN, been the first package in this
group
to be c
On 08/24/2014 08:00 AM, ALZ (phyglos.org) wrote:
On 08/24/2014 02:47 AM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 11:19:07PM +0200, ALZ (phyglos.org) wrote:
Hi,
I'm building Xorg from BLFS last-SVN, been the first package in this
group
to be compiled libdrm-2.4.56.
It just stops at ./configu
On 08/24/2014 02:47 AM, Ken Moffat wrote:
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 11:19:07PM +0200, ALZ (phyglos.org) wrote:
Hi,
I'm building Xorg from BLFS last-SVN, been the first package in this group
to be compiled libdrm-2.4.56.
It just stops at ./configure with...
==
On Sat, 2014-08-23 at 23:19 +0200, ALZ (phyglos.org) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm building Xorg from BLFS last-SVN, been the first package in this
> group to be compiled libdrm-2.4.56.
>
> It just stops at ./configure with...
>
> =
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 11:19:07PM +0200, ALZ (phyglos.org) wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm building Xorg from BLFS last-SVN, been the first package in this group
> to be compiled libdrm-2.4.56.
>
> It just stops at ./configure with...
>
> ===
Hi,
I'm building Xorg from BLFS last-SVN, been the first package in this
group to be compiled libdrm-2.4.56.
It just stops at ./configure with...
=
Building: libdrm-2.4.56 |tar.bz2| () at Sat Aug 23 22:31:09 CEST
20 matches
Mail list logo
