Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: ServiceWorkerBypassFetchHandlerForMainResources

On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 7:41 PM Shunya Shishido wrote: > Thank you Chris, yes we filed an issue > on the ServiceWorker > Github repo and asked for feedback there. > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 2:03 AM Chris Harrelson > wrote: > >> LGTM >> >> I agr

[blink-dev] [PSA] re Iframe Render Throttling

tl;dr Shortly (before M112 branch) I hope to enable a fix we landed for crbug.com/958475, designed to make sure that same-process, cross-origin iframes with display:none or that are not visible experience the same render throttling behavior as cross-process iframes. Our previous attempt to land thi

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate: non-standard `shadowroot` attribute for declarative shadow DOM

On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 5:19 PM Jason Robbins wrote: > On Wednesday, February 15, 2023 at 10:14:48 PM UTC-8 yoav...@chromium.org > wrote: > +Jason Robbins - FYI, this didn't make it to the chromestatus tool. > > I have an idea about what went wrong. > > "Intent to deprecate" is the subject line t

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate: non-standard `shadowroot` attribute for declarative shadow DOM

On Wednesday, February 15, 2023 at 10:14:48 PM UTC-8 yoav...@chromium.org wrote: +Jason Robbins - FYI, this didn't make it to the chromestatus tool. I have an idea about what went wrong. "Intent to deprecate" is the subject line that is expected for the first stage in the deprecation process.

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Legacy callback-based RTCPeerConnection.getStats() API

hey Yoav, Am Fr., 17. Feb. 2023 um 08:52 Uhr schrieb Yoav Weiss < yoavwe...@chromium.org>: > Hey Henrik! > > I think the general outline of the plan makes sense, but the timelines > seem too aggressive. As we've recently seen in the track stats removal, > there can be a time difference between th

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and remove: CSP prefetch-src directive

Cool! Apologies for the noise! :) On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 10:49 AM Noam Rosenthal wrote: > > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 10:02 AM Yoav Weiss > wrote: > >> +Jason Robbins - another one that our tooling >> missed.. >> >> This intent seems to be missing a lot of the typical fields intents have, >>

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and remove: CSP prefetch-src directive

On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 10:02 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > +Jason Robbins - another one that our tooling > missed.. > > This intent seems to be missing a lot of the typical fields intents have, > which makes it hard to review that all the checkboxes are properly filled. > Can you maybe resend it based

Re: [blink-dev] PSA: A Blink runtime feature generates a base::Feature by default

Indeed. This will be very helpful. Thank you! On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 6:55 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > Amazing work, thank you so much!! > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 6:03 AM TAMURA, Kent wrote: > >> Now a runtime feature entry in runtime_enabled_features.json5 generates >> a base::Feature instance wi

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and remove: CSP prefetch-src directive

+Jason Robbins - another one that our tooling missed.. This intent seems to be missing a lot of the typical fields intents have, which makes it hard to review that all the checkboxes are properly filled. Can you maybe resend it based on the Chromestatus template? On Sun, Feb 5, 2023 at 7:50 AM N