As for MemoryCache interoperability, I expect this experiment doesn't make
things worse, because this experiment doesn't change the cache hit logic,
and only changes the lifetime of resources.
There will be observable changes (e.g. by observing which resources are
loaded from the network), but they
On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 8:57 AM Philip Jägenstedt
wrote:
> LGTM3
>
Thanks for the LGTMs!
> On 3/21/23 3:01 AM, Noam Rosenthal wrote:
>>
>> Thanks for raising this issue. You and I discussed this several months
>>> ago. I think my view is the same as before: using `z-index` and `overflow`
>>> a
Contact emailsjap...@chromium.org, dome...@chromium.org
Explainerhttps://github.com/WICG/navigation-api#manual-commit
Specification
Summary
Normally, when navigateEvent.intercept() is called, the intercepted
navigation commits (and therefore the URL updates) as soon as the
NavigateEvent finishe
On 3/21/23 13:53, Adam Argyle wrote:
> I think it would be useful to know if you have positive feedback from web
developers who have tried to incorporate it into actual designs
Here's a few examples I've seen where not just developers getting excited
about the single LOC they need to add for
For what it's worth, if this library tries to access local files this
is not going to work inside of blink because of the sandbox
(https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/HEAD/docs/design/sandbox.md)
You'd probably have to figure out some kind of mojo interface for that.
Christian
On We
LGTM3
On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 4:52 PM Mike Taylor wrote:
> LGTM2
> On 3/21/23 3:01 AM, Noam Rosenthal wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 8:13 PM Mason Freed wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 1:19 AM Noam Rosenthal
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Voicing some concern about this API that I've raised befo
LGTM1 with the note that TAG reviews should be filed at I2P-time.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this d
We discussed this in the API owners meeting today. Since position requests
were just filed, we'd like to give this another week to see if anyone has
any feedback. But otherwise we're excited to see this ship.
Rick
On Wed, Mar 15, 2023 at 6:10 PM Joey Arhar wrote:
> TAG review: https://github.co
LGTM2
On 3/21/23 3:01 AM, Noam Rosenthal wrote:
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 8:13 PM Mason Freed wrote:
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 1:19 AM Noam Rosenthal
wrote:
Voicing some concern about this API that I've raised before,
and perhaps I'm reading this wrong and it was addres
I forgot to follow-up here - the deprecation trials are now working in M112
(modulo one issue to fix for
DisableThirdPartySessionStoragePartitioningAfterGeneralPartitioning related
to domains on the PSL) , and we hope to send an I2S in the near future
looking for approval to ship in M113.
On T
I'm attempting to integrate onnxruntime with the blink renderer in order to
categorize all JavaScript code and only download the ones labeled as
"required" during subsequent visits to the website.
The onnxruntime consists of header files and a dynamic library file
(libonnxruntime.so). How can
Thanks Mike!
On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 10:25 PM Mike Taylor wrote:
> Thanks Titouan.
>
> LGTM to extend to 116 inclusive.
> On 3/21/23 6:31 AM, Titouan Rigoudy wrote:
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> The current trial is indeed ending with 113. We would like to extend it 3
> more milestones.
>
> We are working to
12 matches
Mail list logo
