Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Legacy callback-based RTCPeerConnection.getStats() API

Chiming in briefly here - it appears (from my console messages) that BrowserStack is currently hitting this deprecation. BrowserStack sessions in M115 restart on ~5 second intervals with a console error pointing to this deprecation. Might be worth reaching out to them to talk about

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Motion Path

Hi Daniil, On 5/11/23 8:38 AM, Daniil Sakhapov wrote: Contact emails sakha...@chromium.org Explainer As part of the Interop 2023 we ship the rest of the CSS Motion Path. Currently only path() works. And after a spec has been reworked other path types are ready to be

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Private State Tokens API

LGTM1 % resolving the following spec issues: https://github.com/WICG/trust-token-api/issues/232 https://github.com/WICG/trust-token-api/issues/230 On Wed, May 10, 2023 at 5:52 AM Mike West wrote: Will devtools help guide developers towards enrollment? Also I think Mike's question on

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Implement & Ship: User-Agent Reduction Phase 6 (deviceModel and androidVersion reduction in Android)

Hi all, UA Reduction Phase 6 is ramping up to 100% of the stable release population as of today. thanks, Mike On 4/25/23 4:42 PM, Victor Tan wrote: Hi blink-dev, UA Reduction Phase 6  is ramping up to 50% of the stable release population today. Thanks. Victor On Tuesday, April 4, 2023

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Implement & Ship: User-Agent Reduction Phase 6 (deviceModel and androidVersion reduction in Android)

On 4/25/23 4:42 PM, Victor Tan wrote: Hi blink-dev, UA Reduction Phase 6  is ramping up to 50% of the stable release population today. Thanks. Victor On Tuesday, April 4, 2023 at 2:04:37 PM UTC-4 Victor Tan wrote: Hi blink-dev, UA Reduction Phase 6  is currently ramping up to 10%

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Add value argument to URLSearchParams's has() and delete()

jornalmassa.com.br doesn't seem to be calling these methods with two arguments, at least in my testing. The rest of sites do occasionally (sometimes with the second argument being 0, sometimes a different number, sometimes a string), but none seemed to break in my testing. Andreu On 5/12/23

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Add value argument to URLSearchParams's has() and delete()

Hey! I have filed the Mozilla issue here https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/801 In regards to the given urls to investigate the URLs themselves are all landing pages, I may be wrong I believe the metrics counter would be capturing usages within different user flows no? We

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype: Web environment integrity API

> This seems to create a large power for site owners to dictate & control user behavior. I want to be forthright in saying that I have the same concerns. For this reason, it is an explicit goal in the explainer to "Continue to allow web browsers to browse the Web without attestation." (ref

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Experiment: Compute Pressure

Thank you, Mike. -Ajay On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 11:43 PM Mike West wrote: > Extending from M117 to M118 LGTM. > > -mike > > > On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 7:14 AM 'Ajay Rahatekar' via blink-dev < > blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > >> Hello API Owners, >> >> The Intent to Experiment mentions Origin

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Deprecate and Remove Web SQL

Hi all, Thanks for communicating the plans for this removal with this additional information. However, we still have two questions about this: - Does it mean that in M119 WebSQL will not be working by default, but it will still be possible to enable it back with this configuration setting?

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Add value argument to URLSearchParams's has() and delete()

I would imagine code like ["parameter1", "parameter2"].map(searchParameters.has.bind(searchParameters)) in which case it will start to return falses because the second parameter (index in the .map callback) will now be the value. This kind of code is always fragile, though, so kind of... Tough

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Add value argument to URLSearchParams's has() and delete()

On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 11:57 AM Debadree Chatterjee wrote: > Hey! > > > to ensure Mozilla is aware this happening? > > I am filing an issue for this > Thanks! Can you link it here when filed? > > What can you say about usage in the wild here? > > In regards to this I believe no more data was

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Add value argument to URLSearchParams's has() and delete()

Hey! > to ensure Mozilla is aware this happening? I am filing an issue for this > What can you say about usage in the wild here? In regards to this I believe no more data was collected, one example of usage where two arguments may be used was pointed out here

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: timestamp field on RTCEncodedVideoFrameMetadata

Re TAG, the original review for this API was https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/531. Re signals, looks like this would have been better expressed as "no signal" from other UAs to capture the formal stance, with just a note about informal support in the WG. I would suggest it

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Add value argument to URLSearchParams's has() and delete()

It looks like this was spec'd in https://github.com/whatwg/url/pull/735, with participation from Chromium and WebKit folks. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1831587 was filed for Gecko, but there's no clear position. Would you mind filing an issue at

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Deprecate and Remove Web SQL

Hi Asier, - Does it mean that in M119 WebSQL will not be working by default, but it > will still be possible to enable it back with this configuration setting? > Would this be the case until M123? As a site owner, you can take part in the deprecation trial, which will be available until Chrome

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Add value argument to URLSearchParams's has() and delete()

Given that the feature is pretty small it was recommended to me to directly take it to intent to ship stage Thank You! On Friday, May 12, 2023 at 1:00:08 PM UTC+5:30 Debadree Chatterjee wrote: > Contact emailsdebad...@gmail.com > > ExplainerNone > >

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Add value argument to URLSearchParams's has() and delete()

Contact emails debadree...@gmail.com Explainer None Specification https://url.spec.whatwg.org/#dom-urlsearchparams-has Summary This feature adds the ability to pass a `value` argument to URLSearchParams's has() and delete() methods which allow for deleting tuples

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: WebAuthn PRF extension

Hello. I don't have any present use cases as a web developer here, but I'm very excited & thrilled to see this extension. Giving users ways to secure their data is a very significant win & this seems like a straightforward low-level capability to enable that. Thanks. -- You received this

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype: Web environment integrity API

This can be sent to websites’ web servers to verify that the environment the web page is running on is trusted by the attester. I'm not sure how RFC 8890 compliant this proposal is. This seems to create a large power for site owners to dictate & control user behavior. But RFC 8890 says that

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Experiment: Compute Pressure

Extending from M117 to M118 LGTM. -mike On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 7:14 AM 'Ajay Rahatekar' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Hello API Owners, > > The Intent to Experiment mentions Origin Trial duration of M115 - M117. We > would like approval to have the Origin Trial for M115 -