[blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: “uuid-in-package” navigation with Web Bundles

Primary eng (and PM) emails hay...@chromium.org, ksakam...@chromium.org, denom...@chromium.org Summary Deprecate and remove the “uuid-in-package” navigation support with Web Bundles, which is an extension

[blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Protected Audience Bidding & Auction Services

Contact emailspauljen...@chromium.org, kle...@google.com Explainer Browser API: https://github.com/WICG/turtledove/blob/main/FLEDGE_browser_bidding_and_auction_API.md Bidding & Auction Services: https://github.com/privacysandbox/fledge-docs/blob/main/bidding_auction_services_api.md

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Add value argument to URLSearchParams's has() and delete()

It would be something like this - https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/rDaQdKpWAx8/m/qjTlRNShAgAJ ☆*PhistucK* On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 10:25 AM Philip Jägenstedt wrote: > Hey Andreu, > > Can you give an example of what the code looks like that calls the methods > with a

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Private State Tokens API

Thanks, we'll work on fixing those two issues. I'm not sure what the general flow for enrollment in DevTools will look like, but if there's a general flow to detect when enrollment is missing for other APIs that check at runtime, we can try to integrate with that when PST calls are made with an

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship : Content-type in Resource Timing

On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 4:43 PM Mike Taylor wrote: > I see that both the Resource Timing > and Fetch > PRs have landed - does that > mean this I2S is unblocked now (and just needs an LGTM3)? > I

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship : Content-type in Resource Timing

I see that both the Resource Timing and Fetch PRs have landed - does that mean this I2S is unblocked now (and just needs an LGTM3)? On 5/3/23 3:55 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: Update: +Anne van Kesteren

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Private Network Access preflight requests for subresources

Titouan, et.al. Is this still awaiting more feedback, and/or another intent to ship? This post: https://developer.chrome.com/blog/private-network-access-update/ was brought to my attention by our marketing department, but appears to be concerned with mixed content. (I do not expect our

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Add value argument to URLSearchParams's has() and delete()

Hey! update from mozilla's side they seem to be positive: https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/801#issuecomment-1547693061 On Monday, May 15, 2023 at 2:55:45 PM UTC+5:30 Philip Jägenstedt wrote: > Hey Andreu, > > Can you give an example of what the code looks like that calls

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Legacy callback-based RTCPeerConnection.getStats() API

Thanks Mason, we're reaching out On Sat, May 13, 2023 at 3:27 AM Mason Freed wrote: > Chiming in briefly here - it appears (from my console messages) that > BrowserStack is currently hitting this deprecation. BrowserStack sessions > in M115 restart on ~5 second intervals with a console error

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Add value argument to URLSearchParams's has() and delete()

No worries at all! :) On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 10:43 AM Debadree Chatterjee wrote: > Hey! so sorry for missing it I filed for moving it to the Intent to Ship > stage since it was recommended that it's small enough a feature to move to > that stage here: >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Add value argument to URLSearchParams's has() and delete()

Hey Andreu, Can you give an example of what the code looks like that calls the methods with a second argument? Best regards, Philip On Fri, May 12, 2023 at 8:51 PM Andreu Botella wrote: > jornalmassa.com.br doesn't seem to be calling these methods with two > arguments, at least in my testing.

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Add value argument to URLSearchParams's has() and delete()

Hey! so sorry for missing it I filed for moving it to the Intent to Ship stage since it was recommended that it's small enough a feature to move to that stage here: https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/rDaQdKpWAx8 I have also filed for a Mozilla standards position as you

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Add value argument to URLSearchParams's has() and delete()

Thanks for working towards alignment here! :) On Thu, May 11, 2023 at 2:25 PM Debadree Chatterjee wrote: > Contact emailsdebadree...@gmail.com > > ExplainerNone > > Specificationhttps://url.spec.whatwg.org/#dom-urlsearchparams-has > > Summary > This feature adds the ability to pass a `value`