Looks good, thanks.
-Caleb
On Monday, May 22, 2023 at 1:28:59 PM UTC-4 Adam Langley wrote:
> On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 11:00 AM Caleb Raitto wrote:
>
>> On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 6:11:17 PM UTC-4 Adam Langley wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 9:55 AM Caleb Raitto wrote:
>>
>> Thanks, makes
On Fri, May 19, 2023 at 6:56 AM Simon Hangl wrote:
> Contact emails
>
> simo...@chromium.org
>
> Explainer
>
> https://github.com/screen-share/capture-all-screens/blob/main/explainer.md
>
> Specification
>
> https://screen-share.github.io/capture-all-screens/
>
> Design docs
>
>
Thanks!
On 5/21/23 9:06 PM, Yoav Weiss wrote:
My LGTM still stands!
On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 8:03 PM Mike Taylor wrote:
Hi all,
Due to the need to add 3P support to the
DisableThirdPartyStoragePartitioning deprecation trial (which has
landed in the M115 branch), we would like
On Fri, May 5, 2023 at 11:00 AM Caleb Raitto wrote:
> On Thursday, May 4, 2023 at 6:11:17 PM UTC-4 Adam Langley wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 2, 2023 at 9:55 AM Caleb Raitto wrote:
>
> Thanks, makes sense -- can a note about this be added to the privacy
> section of the explainer / spec?
>
>
> I think
For basic testing of the sites, I saw no breaking behavior, I did a few
actions on sites like adding things to the cart, trying to go the login
flow clicking on navigation, etc. Although I think would need to go a
little deep on that, Should I submit a new CL for this counter thing? or do
Well, this is a tricky case with no obvious answer. You've found one case
of array.some(...), which most likely will change the behavior of the code.
For the other cases where a second argument is passed is explicitly, it
depends on the value whether it changes behavior, if it's the same value
Hi blink-dev,
We posted a major Privacy Sandbox announcement on 2023/05/18:
https://privacysandbox.com/news/the-next-stages-of-privacy-sandbox-general-availability
https://developer.chrome.com/blog/shipping-privacy-sandbox/
As an FYI, here are the key points distilled for readers of this list:
